Blog

International Women’s Day

March 9th, 2010 by Kelly Seeger

Yesterday marked the 99th International Women’s Day, a holiday that celebrates the achievements across the globe by ambitious, successful women in a variety of fields. Since gender disparities are a hot topic amongst international cultures, I really support this holiday and believe it is important to recognize.

Since forming early in the 20th century, International Women’s Day has gained more and more recognition. Though women have obviously gained more equality in some countries compared to others, I think the achievements of women worldwide are worth recognizing. Doing this encourages other women to have hope and to have encouragement to succeed socially, economically and politically.

I have always been interested in the significance the Torah and Judaism in general gives toward women. For the most part, men and women are treated equally in Jewish text. One of the particular texts that I think embodies this notion best is in the Ten Commandments. We are told to honor both our mother and our father. Learning this as a child, when fighting occurs between the child and the parents, I think it is necessary to be recognized.

Further, I believe Judaism tries even harder to treat men and women equally because they switch up the order in which they address men and women or women and men together. I think this instills good values in young Jews who are being shaped by the messages of these texts.

While there are more specific issues regarding the role of gender in other forms of Judaism, I was raised in a Reform congregation and had a very liberal, egalitarian attitude on this. In fact, my congregation had two female rabbis and one male rabbi. While the male rabbi (Doug Sagal) was the head, I felt admiration looking up to this solid trio of rabbis. Since I was raised in a suburban town where many of the mothers were housewives (mine works full-time), it was another reassurance from my community that plenty of women in the real world go out and pursue great careers like these rabbis. Further, when I was in high school one of the female rabbis (Leah Doberne-Schor) had her first child, which reinforced the idea that it is possible for a woman to have a strong, important and influential career while also raising a family.

Though I was lucky enough to have role models like these figures in my life to demonstrate women’s empowerment, there are many other societies that do not get this opportunity. I would like to recommend a book —
Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide —by the power couple Nicholas Kristof and Cheryl WuDunn. This follows their adventure through societies such as Ethiopia’s and Cambodia’s where women are extremely oppressed and seen as inferior to men. In particular, this book discusses the prevalence of forced-prostitution and childbirth injuries. This past fall Kristof actually gave a lecture on this subject at my college, which made me even more aware of the benefits I have had in my life. Beware: this book is definitely a tear-jerker, but I feel like its awakening message alerts its audience to a critical issue that is often forgotten about in day-to-day media coverage.

Anyway, I hope you all had a lovely International Women’s Day! But of course, I must end this entry with encouragement to appreciate the women in your life, and their achievements, on a daily basis.

Israeli Apartheid Week: Triumph of the Fringes

March 9th, 2010 by Harpo Jaeger

I’ll add my perspective to the discussion on Israeli Apartheid Week between Ben Sales and Sam Melamed by pointing out a terrific piece on the J Street U blog by University of Pittsburgh senior Benjamin Kamber.

The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement (BDS) is entirely counterproductive in its pursuit of an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, yet at the same time, many pro-Israel groups on campus respond to this movement in equally counterproductive ways.

Benjamin is spot-on in his analysis of why IAW is so important.  IAW is a problem not because it’s anti-semitic (I’ve written about this on Jewschool) or because it is run by evil people.  No, most of them are very well-meaning (many, in point of fact, are Jewish [and even if they weren't, I still wouldn't think they were anti-semitic]), and they do have command of the facts of the situation.  It’s a legitimate political movement, one with targeted, specific goals.  The use of economic pressure to address a political wrong is an established tactic.  These are not reasons to criticize IAW and BDS.

However, Benjamin points out exactly why we should criticize it, particularly on a college campus.

When unaffiliated students see these types of protests and counter protests, they will more likely than not simply block out the entire message. They have heard these talking points from both sides already and often do not identify with either side.

Israeli Apartheid Week is a triumph of the fringes.  Both of them.  The “pro-Palestinian” folks get to display their flashy banners, hold some loud and angry rallies (don’t get me wrong, I enjoy megaphones as much as the next guy – I own one and keep it in my dorm room), and do the whole “you’re complicit in occupation and apartheid” thing.  The “pro-Israel” groups bust out every bit of “it’s the only democracy in the Middle East”, “they invented AIM”, and so on.

Bottom line: while I respect these groups’ right to disagree with each other (and me), I have a fundamental belief that the only way to be pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian is to be unequivocally pro-peace.  I see BDS as counterproductive to the dialogue on peace. So, too, do I see the Israel apologists’ point of view.  IAW gives both of these groups yet another chance to parade their own values, ignoring the other’s motivations (”pro-Israel” groups denounce IAW as anti-Semitic, “pro-Palestinian” groups denounce the Israel groups as supportive of occupation and human rights infringement) and arguments, and, equally importantly, ignoring what other people are interested in.  Back to Benjamin:

…most students want to see real, tangible solutions being advocated for.

Forgive me for being a bit blunt, but it’s time for people to put up or shut up.  As a peace activist I will no longer be confined to the “idealist” camp.  I submit that peace is the only pragmatic and practical way forward.  We’ve spent far too long mired in criticism and rejection of others’ right to hold and advocate for a viewpoint.  While I certainly won’t advocate against student groups’ right to hold demonstrations or events, I will continue to criticize anyone who thinks that political posturing and drawing lines in the sand will lead to any kind of productive or sustainable solution.

I don’t expect anyone to stop advocating for what they believe in.  But anyone who cares about this issue has a duty to examine the impact that their belief has on the public discourse.  Failing to do so is a betrayal of the political process; it prioritizes our own advocacy over the resolution of the actual issue.  ”Making your voice heard” is a great saying, but the point of making your voice heard is to change something for the better.  If the way you’re making your voice heard is causing the dialogue to regress, not progress, change your voice.

You owe the victims of this conflict nothing less.

Israeli Apartheid Week: Part of the Problem

March 8th, 2010 by Ben Sales

The Israeli occupation of the West Bank is a problem we cannot ignore.

Sam Melamed agrees with me. He also says that Israel isn’t an apartheid state: on that we agree as well.

Where we differ is in how we choose to approach Israeli Apartheid Week, which purports to strive to bring peace to the Palestinians by supporting boycotts, divestment and sanctions on Israel. Sam sees IAW as part of the solution; I see it as part of the problem. Sam writes that in his initial post on IAW,

I sought to encourage a constructive dialogue within Israel and abroad on the issues and arguments espoused during IAW. My goal was to argue against the knee-jerk reaction of too many Jews and Israelis, which impels them to immediately dismiss any criticism of the state of Israel as anti-Zionist.

I agree that any criticism of Israel is not anti-Zionist, but  IAW is anti-Zionist. This is important because we need to look at how we brand our criticism of Israel. We cannot, as Sam desires, look at the content of IAW divorced from the way it presents itself. IAW seeks not only the liberation of the Palestinian people (a cause I support), but also the death of Israel (a cause I do not support, to say the least).

IAW is destructive to the aim of peace in the region. We cannot support the content of IAW and oppose its form, because the content and form come in a package–a package bounded by hate, intolerance and antagonism.

Sam also writes that while IAW may demonize Israel internationally, the Israeli occupation demonizes Israel more. But why demonize Israel at all? We need to find a way in which the occupation can end through Israelis and Palestinians’ working together, not against each other. A Palestinian state must also be a victory for Israel, not Israel’s defeat. IAW does not support that vision.

On that note, Sam writes,

I’ve spoken with many Zionists who do support calls for boycotts, divestment, and sanctions… I’d argue that the American lobby J Street’s Invest in Peace campaign speaks to the growing sentiment among many Jews who believe in the promise of a Jewish state but are against what they see to be discriminatory Israeli policy.

But the headline of that J Street link says “Invest, don’t Divest.” J Street–without exception–is against the BDS movement that Sam defends in this passage, and opposes IAW.

Sam ends his post with a call for tikkun olam, and so will I. We need to repair the world by working together, not against each other. We need to find solutions rather than problems with each other. IAW seeks to bring peace to the Palestinians by delegitimizing Israel. I hope to help bring peace to the Palestinians by helping bring peace to Israel.

Sam (and commenters), I welcome your response. Don’t let me have the last word.

ShakShook Things Up!

March 8th, 2010 by Aaron Strick

The word on everyone’s mind lately seems to be Shakshouka. What is it? Check out the Wikipedia definition right here:

Shakshouka (also shakshuka, shaqshuqa, chakchouka; Arabic: شكشوكة‎; Hebrew: שקשוקה‎) is a North African dish consisting of poached or fried eggs cooked in a sauce of tomatoes, peppers, onions, and spices (often including cumin, turmeric, and chillies), and usually served with white bread .[1]

Originally enjoyed by rulers of the Ottoman Empire, this dish later amassed its greatest popularity among the North African countries. Shakshouka was then taken to Israel largely by Tunisian Jews after the Jewish exodus from Arab lands. This dish is now a staple of Yemeni, Israeli, Tunisian, Algerian, Somali and Moroccan cuisine.[2] It is similar to the Turkish dish Menemen, and the Latin American breakfast dish Huevos rancheros.

Still not clear? Basically, it is the easiest, most flavorful dish that Israelis make. Make any tomato sauce (impossible to mess up). Crack a bunch of eggs into it (very hard to mess up). Wait. Eat. This is exactly what me and my roommate, a recent visitor of the famed Dr. Shakshouka restaurant in Tel Aviv, tried to do.

We started by sauteeing some onions and fresh tomatoes in all of the spices we could find:

Spiced!Next step? Like I said, it is unbelievably easy. Just dump in a can of tomato puree. Once that get’s boiling, dump in a bunch of eggs:

Sauced! Egged!Just let it sit for a bit until the eggs are all good to eat. Ours, I must admit did not turn out quite as pretty as some of the ones I’ve seen online, but it is pretty dang tasty:

Bowled!See those white hunks? Those are the eggs.

The best part about Shakshouka… You can make a ton of it and it tastes great cold. Yes, I am pretty sure it is the only instance (besides egg salad which is in a league of its own), where I have enjoyed cold eggs.

Things are truly different over here in the Holy Land…

Aaron Strick is a Masa participant studying at the University of Haifa, one of Masa Israel’s 160 programs.

More on Israeli Apartheid Week

March 5th, 2010 by Sam Melamed

To start, let me apologize for the delay. I was in the midst of a move and was unable to access the Internet until now. Fortunately, this gave me the opportunity to further grapple with Israeli Apartheid Week–and my editor Ben’s response–and hopefully formulate a coherent defense of my position.

First off, let me acknowledge where I agree with Ben. Namely, Israeli Apartheid can not and will not ever exist. The term, as Ben correctly pointed out, exists solely within the South African political paradigm; it’s an Afrikaans word that pertains exclusively to that country’s discriminatory series of legislation against members of its own population. But semantics aside, there are undeniable similarities between South Africa’s treatment of blacks and coloureds under Apartheid and Israel’s treatment of Gazans and West Bank residents up to and including today.

So while we can all agree that Israeli Apartheid Week is a misnomer on a number of levels – that is, it’s not Apartheid and it’s not a week – its continued presence, now six years strong, begs examination.

The aim of my earlier post was to do just that. At no point did I, as my editor claimed, join in the chorus of the BDS movement. Rather, I sought to encourage a constructive dialogue within Israel and abroad on the issues and arguments espoused during IAW. My goal was to argue against the knee-jerk reaction of too many Jews and Israelis, which impels them to immediately dismiss any criticism of the state of Israel as anti-Zionist and/or anti-Semitic, thereby dismissing any disparagement of Israeli policy as wholly irrational.

While Ben correctly asserts that IAW was spearheaded by anti-Zionists, this does not make the campaign’s arguments any less pertinent. I’ve spoken with many Zionists who do support calls for boycotts, divestment, and sanctions, if only to protect Israel from further Islamic extremism. Further, I’d argue that the American lobby J Street’s Invest in Peace campaign speaks to the growing sentiment among many Jews who believe in the promise of a Jewish state but are against what they see to be discriminatory Israeli policy, South African nomenclature or not.

Ben also mentioned the capability of the BDS movement to “demonize [Israel] internationally.”  While this is no doubt true, Israel’s stubborn refusal to accept criticism might be just as damaging to the nation’s image, if not moreso.  Correctly or incorrectly, people perceive Israel’s confidence as arrogance, its strength as brutality, and its hard-headedness as, well, hard-headedness.  This, without a doubt, plays into the hands of the Ahmadinejads and the Chavezes, allowing for an increasingly negative view of the country in international circles, left and right alike.

My modest proposal is that Israel engage the critiques of IAW and the BDS movement head on.  In fact, to restore calm and perhaps one day attain peace, I believe it must.  Quite simply, these movements will not disappear.  The more Israel and its supporters attempt to brush them off, the more they will fester.  The time to be proactive is now; Israel, show the world you want peace, and I assure you the criticism will abate.

In closing, I’d like to leave you with one final thought.  I am a proud Jew.  However, my identity as a Jew does not go hand-in-hand with my identity as a Zionist.  Rather, it stems from the simple notion of tikkun olam, of repairing the world.  That is what I strive to do everyday, through my writing and in my daily life.  For me, respecting each life, Jew or Gentile, is all-important.  I know enough of Jewish history to realize we need a state of our own, but it pains me to see that miraculous vision tainted by constant violence.  My hope is that this conviction – for peace and coexistence – shines through in these posts.

And lastly, I’d like to thank Ben Sales for what has turned into a vigorous debate.  Like any great editor, you’ve forced me to reevaluate my thinking and distill its true meaning.  If you please, the last word is yours.

Sam Melamed is a Masa participant, participating in Career Israel, one of Masa Israel’s 160 programs.

Creativity: Check!

March 3rd, 2010 by Carly Silver

Imagine Narnia’s Aslan as the Lion of Judah. Or a wardrobe as the Tabernacle. Unlikely, says Michael Weingrad in a recent book review. “To no other field of modern literature have Jews contributed so little,” he writes. The idea that Jews can’t transport ourselves into another dimension? Ridiculous.

I’ll readily admit I’m a fantasy enthusiast. Since I was little, I’ve devoured books by the likes of Tamora Pierce, David Eddings, and other banner-waving authors with magic, royals, and the occasional dragon. Nothing could transport me away from the problems of everyday life faster than a magic carpet or a winged horse. I’d happily fly away…well, you get the idea. I’ve since come to accept the inevitability of the real world.! But the idea that none of my own people are involved in my favorite genre? Preposterous.

Weingrad argues that Jews do not have the same connection to feudal Europe, so often recreated in fantasy, that Western European Christians do. Because of violence against the Jews in medieval Europe, they have no desire to recreate situations that bring to mind such pain. That “is an obstacle in a genre that takes medieval chivalry as its imaginative ideal,” writes Weingrad.

Clearly, that is an issue with fantasy. The Jewish memory is long, as it should be in a religion of such history, and events like the Inquisition and other religious persecutions cannot, and should not, be rubbed out just to write books. But Weingrad disregards the joy of transporting oneself out of one’s own contemporary society that fantasy brings. He may mention it in his article, yes, but he seems surgically removed from the magic of fantasy, regarding it very dispassionately. It takes a fantasy lover to realize that the Jews’ flight of fancy is present in many other pieces of literature that they’ve produced.

For the sake of political expediency and space reasons, I won’t discuss the Bible’s historical accuracy or lack thereof. It may be the most famous piece of Jewish writing we have, but it’s too complicated of a text to examine so cursorily. The most famous example of Jewish fantasy, steeped in European legend and lore, is the Golem.

For those of you who aren’t familiar with the legend, I’ll give you a quick review. In Prague, a rabbi prayed to G-d to send him a means to clear Israel of rumors of ritual Christian murder. G-d told him to make a clay image that would accomplish his goals. To harness the four elements, the rabbi used his son-in-law (representing fire), his favorite student (water), himself and his knowledge (wind), and the clay (earth). Using Kabalistic ritual, he created an image of clay, the Golem, that performed acts of justice in the face of those determined to deface the Jewish reputation.

This tale clearly has many elements of fantasy. Magic is one of the biggest tools used in fantasy writing to separate the fictive from the real worlds. Though the story is set in Prague, it is clear that the Prague we see is not the Prague that literally existed. We hear a folktale of a giant clay man that’s a soldier for righteousness and hear of Jews’ reputations being harmed. It is likely that that is true, for much antagonism, as we have seen, existed against the Jews.

This alternative history in vindicating the Jews is a clear literary tradition, though, that developed out of storytelling and religious beliefs. What else is fantasy but these things? One may argue that Weingrad meant “the fantasy genre of the modern day” in his article. Fantasy isn’t a recent invention, though. The genre has been around for a long time and it is important to recognize our own place in it.

The Global Citizen on Corporatocracy and the Jubilee

March 3rd, 2010 by Faigy E. Abdelhak

AJWS logoThe Global Citizen is a joint project of New Voices and the American Jewish World Service (AJWS). Throughout the year, a group of former AJWS volunteers will offer their take on global justice, Judaism, and international development. Opinions expressed by Global Citizen bloggers do not necessarily represent AJWS.

John Perkins held a job covertly called being an Economic Hit Man (EHM) at Chas. T. Main, Inc. (MAIN) from 1971 to 1980. Perkins succinctly defines EHMs as “highly paid professionals who cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars.” MAIN is a privately-held company who essentially works for the Corporatocracy (a term he uses for corporations, banks, and governments), but lies outside the international governance regulations due to their private status. Perkins would travel all over the developing world, composing economic forecasts indicating the economic boom that would take place if the country in question were to build the infrastructures necessary for development. These projects, such as new highways, electricity grids, pipes, roads, and airports, would be built through U.S. companies and would be funded by loans. Hence, developing countries would be convinced (or perhaps, bullied) into taking loans from the developed world and funneling this money back into developed-world companies. Then EHMs would ensure the countries sink deeper and deeper into debt so that the U.S. could leverage them for anything from oil to UN votes.confessions-of-an-economic-hit-man

Years after his conscience told him to quit, Perkins wrote a tell-all, courageous book entitled “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” about his life and experiences. Through the lens of his role, he also narrates the larger U.S. shift in the post-World War II world from a republic to an empire. He describes his former job as follows: “The unspoken aspect of every one of these projects was that they were intended to create large profits for the contractors, and to make a handful of wealthy and influential families in the receiving countries very happy, while assuring the long-term financial dependence and therefore the political loyalty of governments around the world. The larger the loan, the better. The fact that the debt burden placed on the country would deprive its poorest citizens of health, education, and other social services for decades to come was not taken into consideration.”

The growing debt in developing countries, and the efforts to keep it that way, is one of the largest obstacles to food, potable water, shelter, education, and other basic humans rights around the world. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth in these countries benefits a few families and developed nations, while the debt they generate burden and further suffocate majority of the population.

Forgiving debts is an integral part of Jewish tradition, and in view of the moral ramifications of a world without this reality, I am unsurprised. Looking at the Jewish yearly cycles, there is Shmeta every seven years, a year in which the land of Israel lies fallow and all crops are free for all to take, and then there is a Jubilee every 50 years, in which all debts are forgiven and all personal property (primarily land) is restored to its original owner. Any unpaid loans are null and void, and everyone has a clean slate. Although debates and laws about fairness towards lenders abound, at the heart of the Jubilee is an important concept currently lost on the modern world. However, there is an organization that this concept it not lost on, and you guess it—it’s called Jubilee.jubileelogo

Jubilee is an interfaith, international movement to forgive third world debt; their domestic branch is the Jubilee USA Network. I first heard about this network in the book “The Year of Living Biblically,” by A.J. Jacobs.  In it he writes, “Back in the 1990s, two British Evangelists named Martin Dent and Bill Peters has an epiphany: They made the connection between the Bible’s Jubilee concept and the third-world debt crises…The Jubilee movement they started has resulted in massive cancellations of debt by England, France, the U.S., and others.” And of course, the movement “got a huge publicity boost when Bono and his sunglasses joined the cause.”

Forgiving the debt is important, to be sure, but it is also the symptom of a larger problem that requires addressing in its own right; the global web of corruption implemented by the Corporatocracy. To combat this web, Peter Eigen founded Transparency International to end international corruption by exposing it. Thus, they have composed their own definition for corruption: “Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. It hurts everyone whose life, livelihood or happiness depends on the integrity of people in a position of authority.” For the full explanation of how Eigen came to this definition and to build TI, listen to his talk at a TedX Berlin conference about his life and work thus far.  In his bio on TED.com it states, “Stunned by the depth and pervasiveness — and sheer destructiveness — of the corruption he [Perkins] encountered, he formed the group Transparency International to take on some of the main players in deals with corrupt officials: multinational corporations.”

red_box_g20_transparencytransparency_international1

Corporatocracy, EHMs, third world debt, and lack of transparency are tremendous obstacles in achieving human rights for all the world’s citizens. If every individual and entity practiced the values inherent in Shmeta and the Jubilee, perhaps the world would not be in the state it is today. To me, these yearly cycles represent fighting our internal inclination towards greed and recognizing our worldly assets aren’t truly ours. By practicing debt forgiveness and the sharing of crops, people learn not to cling too tightly to material gains or their importance. These traits, which seem to be the keys in the likes of Jubilee and Transparency International, may also the gateway towards human rights for all.

The Problems with Israeli Apartheid Week

March 1st, 2010 by Ben Sales

It’s not often that I take to the New Voices blog to disagree with one of our writers, but I’d like to respond to Sam Melamed’s post from earlier today.

Sam defends Israeli Apartheid Week as an effort “to louden international calls for the BDS movement – that is, the boycott of Israeli goods, the divestment from the Israeli economy, and the placement of sanctions on Israeli imports,” and calls it “Two Weeks of Bashing Bibi and His Cronies in Israel’s Military-Security Complex, But NOT Jews In General, While Also Shedding Light on Legitimate Palestinian Grievances.”

He continues that Israeli Apartheid Week (IAW) will not fan the flames of anti-Semitism and says that “to call Israel an Apartheid state is not without provocation.” He adds that we should not be “so quick to dismiss Israeli Apartheid Week as Anti-Semitic or anti-Zionist.”

The fact is that Sam is wrong in his characterization of both IAW, as well as of Israel as an apartheid state. Sam writes that IAW is not anti-Zionist, but IAW’s website states that “Prominent Palestinians, Jewish anti-Zionists, and South Africans have been at the forefront of this struggle [emphasis mine].” In addition, the IAW logo illustrates the land of Israel/Palestine in completely Palestinian colors, flanked by two Palestinians. In its own words, IAW is anti-Zionist.

Sam says that IAW is a week of activism against “Bibi and His Cronies in Israel’s Military-Security Complex,” but IAW is in its sixth year. Six years ago Bibi was an exile in his own party. Since then a center left government ran Israel for about three years while Bib led the opposition. IAW took place each of those years.

Sam implicitly supports IAW’s advocacy of the BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movement by supporting IAW, but at present Sam is living in Israel, contributing to its economy and enjoying its services.

Furthermore, Sam writes that in many ways, Israel is an apartheid state–and cites his extensive study of South Africa’s history in support of that claim. I have not studied South African history, but I do know that Israel does not have an apartheid policy specifically because “apartheid” was a policy unique to South Africa’s government and society. The word comes from South Africa and was the technical name for a set of racist laws. Call Israel racist, discriminatory, prejudiced, whatever, but don’t call it an apartheid state, because the only possible apartheid state–ever–was South Africa pre-1994.

Sam writes that we should get past IAW’s name and look at the policies it advocates. First of all, we cannot dismiss the name: the movement’s founders chose it and it is the first and most prominent thing that outsiders see, as well as the way organizers have chosen to identify themselves. If they want to talk about apartheid, we should talk about it. Moreover, the policies the week advocates are entirely counterproductive to the peace movement. If we want to create real peace between the Palestinians and Israelis, we need to stop blaming one side or the other and focus on ways we can collaborate. Stripping Israel of its economic growth and demonizing it internationally does none of this.

Finally, IAW does fan flames of anti-Semitism. Sam is right that there are anti-Semites who will hate Jews no matter what, but giving those “crazies” a voice in an international forum and aligning them with a group that Sam calls “intelligent, rational people” does indeed increase anti-Semitism.

I do not support Netanyahu’s policies and I am wholeheartedly against the occupation. I believe that Israelis’ and Palestinians’ top priorities need to be reconciliation, justice and peace with each other, and that a real effort toward that end needs to start as soon as possible. IAW, however, works against that end, and calling Israel an apartheid state is at best inaccurate and at worst dangerous to the lives of millions of people, both Israeli and Palestinian.

I welcome Sam’s response to this post.

Israeli Apartheid Week Begins, Blame Game Commences

March 1st, 2010 by Sam Melamed

Today, the sixth incarnation of Israeli Apartheid Week gets underway.  Aiming to amplify international calls for the BDS movement–that is, the boycott of Israeli goods, divestment from the Israeli economy and placement of sanctions on Israeli imports, respectively–organizers have planned various demonstrations in more than 40 international cities over the next 14 days.  And though 14 days is clearly not a week, I’m sure we can all agree Israeli Apartheid Week sounds much better than the Israeli Apartheid Fortnight.  Personally, I would’ve preferred something like “Two Weeks of Bashing Bibi and His Cronies in Israel’s Military-Security Complex, But NOT Jews In General, While Also Shedding Light on Legitimate Palestinian Grievances.”  But alas, that’s just me.

Whatever we call it, Israeli Apartheid Week cannot be dismissed as quickly as its ill-conceived moniker.  To those who point to its potentially damaging repercussions, claiming the demonstrations are merely means to incite hatred and stoke the flames of Anti-Semitism, I disagree.  Simply put, the damage is already done; the crazies hate the Jews, with or without reason, and will go on hating us.  There’s little that Israel, or Jews, can do to change this fact.  No, the real reason we cannot disregard all the films, the demonstrations, and the speeches is because they’re coming more and more frequently from intelligent, rational people and organizations, many Jews included.

The shaded areas, designated as homelands, took up 13% of South Africas land mass but contained its entire black population.

The shaded areas, designated as 'homelands,' took up 13% of South Africa's land mass but contained its entire black population.

And like it or not, I consider myself an intelligent, rational person.  I’m also a scholar of South African history, and while I see many differences in that country’s Apartheid past and Israel’s current situation, there are also unmistakable similarities.  Perhaps the most blatant is Israel’s restrictions on where Palestinians can live.  While the Palestinians are cordoned off in the West Bank and Gaza, Jewish settlers – with the promise of military protection and generous tax breaks, among other things – continue to seize disputed lands.  This mirrors South Africa’s Land Act and the later Group Areas Act, which forced many blacks and coloureds from their homes.  The fact that Palestinians have no vote in Israel also invites the comparison to Apartheid South Africa.

So, to call Israel an Apartheid state is not without provocation.  True, there are no segregated beaches here, as this author points out.  But, do there need to be?  It’s not as if a Gazan – or, for that matter, a resident of Nablus – can leisurely stroll the Tel Aviv promenade.  In fact, Gazans often can’t even go fishing off their own coastline.  Israel is segregated; I don’t need a sign on the beach to tell me so.

The fact is, Palestinians are oppressed.  Does that make Israel an Apartheid state?  That’s not for me to say.  However, as responsible, rational citizens, we must at least take heed of a movement that’s gaining considerable steam among politicians, religious leaders, and academics.  And before being so quick to dismiss Israeli Apartheid Week as Anti-Semitic or anti-Zionist, take a look at the evidence on the other side.

Sam Melamed is a Masa participant, participating in Career Israel, one of Masa Israel’s 160 programs.Masa Israel logo

What On Earth???

March 1st, 2010 by Aaron Strick

I was down in the shukh this week and I encountered what seemed to be a nest of alien eggs! Spindly, green, and round, they seemed to have come here from somewhere near Neo Nebulus Nine and were getting ready to hatch and begin phase two of an invasion of Earth. They were on sale though, and cheap, so I bought one. I should, after all, do my part to save the human race!

Here is a picture:

Kohlrabi

I let it sit for a while, not knowing what to do with it. I returned from class hoping I wouldn’t come home to find a swarm of lizard-like extra-terrestrial maggnatrons and fortunately, I didn’t. Still not knowing what it was, and with this blog in mind, I decided to make an incision.

Kohlrabi KutI was delighted to find what seemed to be an odd combination of an apple, a radish and a carrot. I tasted it. I discovered a wonderfully refreshing rooty flavor with a mild peppery aftertaste. mmmm. It would go great in a salad. So… I did what the Israelis do! I cut up a cucumber and a tomato and made a salad!

The Salad.What’s my recipe? Mix together in a large bowl:

  • Tomato
  • Cucumber
  • The Alien Root
  • A little bit of Onion
  • A couple chopped picked eggplants (with some of the brine)
  • Oil
  • Za’atar
  • Salt
  • Pepper

And there you have some incredible Israeli salad! But what is this green stuff? I was wandering around סופרסל, the local supermarket, when I re-encountered these wild roots. I wrote down their name: קולורבי, and did a little research. It is called a Kohlrabi in English which comes from the German words for Cabbage and Turnip combined. Apparently, it is in the cabbage family, but it resembles a turnip. How creative! It can be eaten raw (recommended) or cooked (have not done). I will try cooking it soon I guess. Or maybe I will find a vegetable from some other world.

Aaron Strick is a Masa participant studying at the University of Haifa, one of Masa Israel’s 160 programs.