Blog

Archive for the ‘Campus’ Category

‘Being Muslim is the new probable cause:’ The student press reports on NYPD’s spying spree [Parsing]

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Yale President Richard Levin has some words to share with Mayor Bloomberg | via yaledailynews.com

“Being Muslim is apparently the new probable cause,” begins today’s editorial in the Washington Square News, NYU’s student newspaper.

Two Muslim students at Yale began a Feb. 17 op-ed in the Yale Daily News with this:

Since the end of the Jim Crow era, politicians have dressed racism in the rhetoric of food stamps and illegal aliens. But as the past 10 years have shown, it seems that politicians need no such disguise for Islamophobia.

Written by Mostafa Al-Alusi and Faisal Hamid, it was the first in a steady stream of news and opinions from YDN on the news that we’ve been reading since Saturday when the AP broke the story: The NYPD has been spying Muslim college students, for apparently no other reason than that they are young Muslims.

Not surprisingly, student press organs at the schools affected have been reporting non-stop on the fierce opposition to the spying program being expressed by both students and school officials.

In my favorite bit so far, YDN’s Crosscampus blog reported that Yale President Richard Levin had harsh words about the NYPD surveillance program. (“Disturbing,” “‘antithetical’ to the values of the University.”) Then Crosscampus wrote that Mayor Michael Bloomberg had responded with these… um… words:

“If going on websites and looking for information is not what Yale stands for, I don’t know.”

Elegant as always, Mr. Mayor. For his part, Levin was able to string these syllables together:

“The Yale Muslim Students Association has been an important source of support for Yale students during a period when Muslims and Islam itself have too often been the target of thoughtless stereotyping, misplaced fear, and bigotry.”

Columbia President Lee Bollinger and Barnard President Debora Spar both told the Columbia Spectator today they knew nothing about the NYPD’s activities:

“We want to be sure our Muslim community knows that we support everyone’s right to carry on their lives and their studies without the feeling of being watched by a government that exists to protect us all,” Bollinger said.

“We are deeply concerned about any government activity that would chill the freedom of thought or intrude upon student privacy, both of which are so essential to our academic community,” he said.

In an op-ed in the Spec, David Fine (a friend of New Voices and the editor of Columbia’s undergraduate Jewish journal, the Current), called Columbia’s Muslim Student Association “a dynamic group that often organizes some of the more considered and stimulating events on campus.”

Recalling an recent campus event, Fine writes that some Muslim students said things that made him uncomfortable:

I was appalled that a fellow student would hold such views, but I would have been more appalled if that student had left her ideas unexpressed for fear of being filed away as a potential threat by the NYPD. The chilling effect that the surveillance program might have on campus speech would mean that such views would go unsaid, and thus certain ideologies left unexposed for the truly deleterious modes of thinking that they pose

In other words, the NYPD is acting as a danger to academic freedom and to freedom of speech, thought and association.

The Daily Princetonian reported on an official statement by  Princeton’s MSA:

“We fear that such actions can lead to the alienation of Muslim-American youth and may cause the return of unethical practice toward minority rights in this country. … The NYPD must be held responsible for violating the trust of its American citizens.”

WSN reported this rather noncommittal response by an NYU spokesman:

“We appreciate that the NYPD has taken on the heavy responsibility of safeguarding New Yorkers from additional terrorist attacks. … We hope that the police department is employing anti-terrorism tactics other than looking at the public websites of student groups, which at a university naturally raises privacy concerns on behalf of its students.”

The Spec also reported that a Muslim Student Association leader has proposed a putting together group of students from MSA, Hillel and other groups to address the issue formally.

In critique of hatred [Gay Marriage]

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012
Proposition 8 Protest

Protestors railing against California's Prop 8, which was recently deemed unconstitutional | photo by flickr user martineno (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Amidst recent controversy in the Orthodox community over the question of homosexuality, as reflected upon by New Voices’ Simi Lampert, and huge gains made by the passage of bills legalizing same sex marriage in the New Jersey legislature, Washington State, and Maryland, not to mention the repeal of Proposition 8 in California, our society is being polarized over this issue, each side being drawn further and further down its own line of reasoning. Upon reading of the attack at Bridgewater State I was deeply saddened, most because the past few weeks have instilled in me a sense that our society is progressing on this issue. Setting aside whether or not you believe in homosexual marriage, it saddens me to know that we live in a society that controversy over whether or not these individuals can wed can inspire such rage and division.

Destinie Mogg-Barkalow is a junior. She is a journalist. She is a thousand other adjectives other than the one her alleged attackers chose to define her as, yet that facet of her personality caused them to assault her in a parking lot, for the crime of being openly gay and speaking her mind. She published an editorial in her school newspaper proclaiming her stance against Proposition 8, just as she was entitled to under her rights to freedom of speech and the press. In return, she was assaulted. Regardless of your positon on the issue, there are certain human rights at play here. She has every right to publish her ideas just as anyone else has every right to disagree with them. And disagreement is fine. However, when hate crimes are inspired by mere editorials, it becomes clear that the picture we are looking at is that of a polar society, with one side moving towards acceptance of homosexual culture, and one side moving away from it. It is up to the Jewish community, as well as the American people at large, to decide which perspective they’d like to embody.

Anti-Semitism at Harvard; Attacked over an editorial; NYPD monitored MSAs, and more [Reading List]

Tuesday, February 21st, 2012
iPad mini

The new OU Kosher App provides handy on the go and up to date information about kosher certifications | photo by flickr user patrick-allen (CC BY-SA 2.0)

No Jews in the Ivy League [Caroline Glick]

Caroline Glick, deputy managing editor of the Jerusalem Post, rails against an upcoming conference at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government which begins with disputing Israel’s right to exist.

“The embrace of the cause of Israel’s destruction by so many celebrity professors today is part and parcel of the destruction of the US higher education system. At the Harvard conference, not a drop of truth will be spoken by any of the eminent Jew hating participants. Students who attend will be presented with lies dripping with moralistic gobbledygook and be told that they are enlightened for embracing this sewage. “

Kosher? There’s an App for that [Reuters]

The OU recently released an updated version of their OU Passover App for iPhone, iPad, and Android. Called OU Kosher, it provides up to date information on a product’s kosher certification, as well as whether or not it is kosher for Passover. The application also updates when a product is no longer OU certified, or when new products gain certification.

NYPD invades privacy [Huffington Post]

New documents obtained by the Associated Press reveal that the NYPD spied on hundreds of Muslim college students throughout the northeast. The operation, the documents reveal, was designed to target Muslim Student Associations as possible stepping stones for some to pursue a career in terrorism. NYPD spokesmen provided a list of 12 people arrested domestically and abroad for terrorism with former ties to MSAs.

“Student groups were of particular interest to the NYPD because they attract young Muslim men, a demographic that terrorist groups frequently draw from. Police worried about which Muslim scholars were influencing these students and feared that extracurricular activities such as paintball outings could be used as terrorist training.”

Attacked for an Editorial [Huffington Post]

A student who published an editorial in her school’s newspaper attacking supporters of California’s recently repealed Proposition 8 was attacked last week. Bridgewater State University officials have condemned the incident, and are holding a rally in her support.

“As the Patriot Ledger is reporting, Destinie Mogg-Barkalow was allegedly approached by a man and a woman who appeared to be fellow students in a parking lot at Bridgewater State University last week. After the pair asked Mogg-Barkalow, who is openly gay, if she wrote the pro-marriage equality article which appeared in The Comment, the university’s student newspaper, the woman punched her in the face, leaving a bruise.”

Do Orthodox Women Hate Women? [Modern Unorthodox]

Thursday, February 16th, 2012
Burning Bra, daytime

Bra burning first evolved as a method of feminist protest in the early 1960s | photo by flickr user Ellie Brewster (CC BY-NC 2.0)

I wouldn’t call myself a rabid feminist. In fact, sometimes I’m so downright feminine that I put Stepford wives to shame. But today two things happened that made me want to whip off my bra and light it on fire right in the middle of my college’s lobby.

Let’s start in the classroom. In one of my many English classes, we were discussing a short story we read in which the main character is a woman. She’s fierce and chooses to become a werewolf in order to kill her husband, who’s been drunkenly whipping, beating, and otherwise abusing her since their wedding night. The point of this story, according to our professor, was to respond to the male-dominated stories of earlier decades. Anyway, one of the students in my class had an issue with the heroine.

“I don’t understand why this woman is such a great person,” she complained. “She doesn’t even have any redeeming qualities. Like, she’s not even pretty!”

Now, to begin with, the lady in the story is pretty awesome. Did I mention she turned herself into a wolf and killed her abusive drunk of a husband? I would consider that a redeeming quality. But let’s get to the more basic idiocy of my classmate’s statement (and, no, I don’t feel bad calling her statement idiotic): being pretty is a redeeming quality now? This entire story is built around empowering women over men and teaching us lessons in feminism, and my classmate is upset because the heroine’s looks aren’t attractive enough to redeem her?

Okay, so one girl in one of my classes at Stern thinks strong women aren’t good, and values looks over assertiveness. But that’s just one girl. Right?

Well, I was on my way to the cafeteria when I passed a sign for an event tomorrow night. The caption on the sign read “What would it be like to be the wife of a world leader?” To be fair, the event is a lecture, the speaker being the wife of the Lubavitcher Rebbe. But I still take umbrage with that tagline; is this all we college women aspire to now? Not to change the world ourselves, but to marry someone who will?

Like I said, I’m not a raging feminist. But I do think women and men should be treated equally; I believe women can be powerful based purely on ability and not looks; I think women can and should work to change the world; and I definitely don’t think I’m going to college right now just so I can find some ambitious husband to marry while I look pretty for him. But apparently not everyone agrees with me (a tragedy in its own right, but especially when it comes to something as basic as gender rights).

Did any of what happened today happen because I’m in an Orthodox school surrounded by Orthodox women? I don’t know. I do know that feminism sometimes feels like it hasn’t hit certain sects of Judaism quite yet, Modern Orthodoxy not excepted. Just last week I was in a meeting where the (left-wing Orthodox) rabbi I was meeting with assumed my male subordinate was in charge for no other reason than that he was male.

On the other hand, many fellow students were outraged at the sign, and many to whom I’ve told the other story were horrified as well. So I can’t make any conclusive remarks about the population of Modern Orthodox women in general. But I can complain about them once in a while.

Speaking up for Israel [Reactions]

Tuesday, February 14th, 2012
BDS 1

BDS advocates have had little economic impact on Israeli businesses, despite the hype | photo by flickr user :::mediActivista::: (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

As David Bernstein points out in this JTA Op-ed, the BDS movement which has seemed to permeate campus culture has had little to no financial ramification for Israel. For something that has been widely discussed in American Jewish circles since its inception, been the target of an Israeli law imposing financial ramifications for anyone who openly calls for a boycott of Israeli goods, it appears to have been just another load of hot air directed towards Israel. The op-ed also raises the striking question of how to advocate for Israel without being another reactionary fighting off those who would wish her harm. What are the ways to be a pro-Israel activist on campus without simply responding to allegations against her?

- Bring Israeli culture to campus. By simply showing the human side of Israel to those who might not know anything besides the exaggerated portraits painted by the media, and taking the country out of a political context by placing it in the sphere of another culture to be celebrated and enjoyed, one can foster support of Israel by simply removing oneself from the debate entirely. Paint a picture not of the embattled country seen on the news, but a vibrant Mediterranean culture attempting to grow and thrive amidst adversity.

- Facilitate conversation. Create a discussion panel for both sides of the issue, making sure everyone’s concerns are addressed. When campus discourse consists merely of two sides shouting at each other, third parties tend to be confused by the noise, and end up forming an opinion on the basis of propaganda strength. By creating a safe atmosphere where both sides may discuss their opinions, one can ease tensions and create an open conversation, rather than a battlefield.

- Don’t feel the need to jump upon every single statement. Yes, there will always be ideas you find impossible to accept, however, pick your battles, and don’t feel the need to address everything. Know the line between those who aim at eliciting a reaction and those who actually mean business, and respond accordingly. Don’t waste your time and energy defending Israel to someone just looking for an argument.

Israel responds to terror attacks; Israeli Valentine’s Day; Holocaust filmmaker turns her lens on media; and more. [Required Reading]

Tuesday, February 14th, 2012

Israel blames Iran for assassination attempts against Israeli diplomats. [Washington Post]

The Israel government responded yesterday to bombings targeting diplomats in both Georgia and India, pinning the blame for the attacks on Hezbollah and Iran. Though Iran is denying responsibility for the incidents, the bombings have propounded concerns over its nuclear program, and led to heightened tension in the region.

“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cited places where he said attacks on Israelis and Jews had recently been foiled, including Thailand and Azerbaijan, and he accused Tehran of orchestrating Monday’s plots, calling Iran ‘the greatest exporter of terrorism in the world.’”

David Bernstein on how supporting Israel on campus shouldn’t be a reactionary pursuit. [JTA]

Bernstein cites the ineffectiveness of the BDS movement on college campuses, as an indication that it is now time to diversify efforts and focus on supporting Israel rather than defending it.

“The real work that must be done in supporting Israel is not reactive at all. It’s not as fun as responding to the Israel bashers or engaging in dueling narratives on the campus quad. The real work targets the influencers, from student government presidents to Indian-American leaders, with a positive, pro-Israel message. It seeks to build long-term allies and sometimes ignores detractors. It’s proactive, not reactive.”

A senior at NYU’s Tisch School of The Arts Film and Television Program’s senior thesis project is a film about the holocaust…from a new angle. [JTA]

Emily Harrold’s thesis examines the way in which American media chose to cover the holocaust, focusing specifically on the New York Times, funded by the NYU Bronfman Center. Harrold, who is not Jewish, says the project was an eye opening glimpse into the way in which media attention was focused during the era.

“When you think about history, it’s always from the perspective of people who win the war, because those are the people who write the history books, usually. So we see history from the perspective of the great country of America in which they’re projecting themselves in the best way that they can. I guess learning that we weren’t the great liberators as much as we like to think of ourselves is sort of what got me interested in the topic.”

Valentine’s Day in Israel carries the weight of cross-cultural communications. [Forward]

Nathan Jeffay examines the ways in which pursuing relationships in Israel differs from that in the United States, and the pitfalls that may arise from taking this American holiday overseas.

“Aliyah among single American Jews was up 9% last year, which can create an echo boom in romantic encounters between sabras and American singles.”

Israel’s last day envisioned; UC Santa Cruz complaint; Labor strikes in Israel; and more [Required Reading]

Thursday, February 9th, 2012

An Israeli filmmaker envisions what Israel’s “last day” would look like, although takes many creative liberties while doing so. However unsettling the video may be, Uriel Heilman notes, it provides a thought provoking, yet unrealistic, depiction of what an attack on Israel and the response would look like. [JTA]

Members of the Jewish clergy have found new ways to cope with their student debt upon graduating by applying for federal loan forgiveness for employees of non-profit organizations. However, the Department of Education recently released new guidelines for who qualifies for this relief – and religious organizations are not on it, sparking an interfaith movement to change the law. [Huffington Post]

“In the small world of seminary training and professional religious jobs, the news that the public service loan forgiveness provision is not an option for religious workers has thrown a wrench in the plans of young pastors, rabbis, imams and other members a profession already known for low pay, long hours and high stress.”

George Clooney to star in new film about art experts chasing down works stolen by the Nazi regime. [JTA]

Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, a lecturer at the University of California, Santa Cruz, discusses why she filed a Title VI complaint against the university, alleging anti-Semitism against Jewish students. [Forward]

“Although he [University President Mark Yudof] implies that the primary target of my complaint is ‘abhorrent speech’ on campus, this is simply not so. Rather, my complaint focuses on university faculty and administrators who have regularly and egregiously abused their positions as employees of a public university and violated the tenets of their profession to promote their own virulently anti-Israel political agenda, which in turn has had deleterious effects on many Jewish students.”

The Histadrut labor federation, Israel’s main labor union, and the Israeli government fail to reach an agreement on contract workers, resulting in the first labor strike the country has seen in five years. [NYT]

Barnard College and the Case on Racism

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

Barnard College
Barnard College the subject of controversy after an alleged slight to a professor with negative views on Israel | photo by Flickr user walkinggeek (CC BY 2.0)

Last fall, a Barnard College professor was accused of discrimination when she allegedly steered  an Orthodox Jewish student away from taking a class taught by controversial professor Joseph Massad. The U.S. Department of Education jumped right in to the mix, sending its Office for Civil Rights to check out the student’s claims. Massad,who has been called anti-Semitic in the past, has been a topic of interest for years. He even went under investigation in past years by an ad hoc committee – he was later found not guilty – but remains one of Columbia’s most notorious professors.

Rachel McDermott, a Barnard faculty member, allegedly counseled the student that she might be uncomfortable in Massad’s course and advised her to take another class. McDermott and the student – who has remained unnamed – give conflicting reports on the issue: the student states that McDermott claimed Massad was anti-Israel, while McDermott alleged the student was the one  to express concerns about taking his class.

Regardless of who said what, McDermott could have been both right and wrong in her actions. Barnard is an extremely closely-knit school in which the faculty looks out for students. Therefore, if a professor – probably thinking about the well-being of a student – advised against taking a  class that might make her uncomfortable, she likely did so to ensure the student got the most enjoyment and value possible out of that class. Even if Professor McDermott was the one to first claim Massad was anti-Israel, she merely expressed Massad’s own point of view.

For example, Massad’s op-ed“The Legacy of Jean-Paul Sartre,” declares: “no matter how much Zionism continues to resurrect it and claim it as the excuse for its racist violence against the Palestinians, the Holocaust does not justify Israel’s racist nature.” This clearly delineates a staunch opposition against Israel for its supposedly racist policies. And if this is the case,  Professor McDermott merely pointed out what Massad himself has already shown. Her claim that Massad is anti-Israel is hardly news, but seemingly a fact. For McDermott to advise the student might be uncomfortable in his class may have been an act of consideration.

I would have a problem, though,  is if McDermott gave more than her two cents. A professor is entitled to offer his or her opinion. If that’s all McDermott did, then that’s fine. If she told the student she would be better off not taking the class, that, in itself, is still an opinion. If, as Tablet alleges, McDermott kept insisting the student shouldn’t take a class, that would cross a line.

At the end of the day, it is  that student’s decision whether or not she should open her mind to different opinions. Though Massad has demonstrated anti-Israel opinions, in today’s day and age, shouldn’t everyone have a voice?

Jewish seminaries doing it right (and by it, I mean ‘it’) [Sex!]

Wednesday, February 1st, 2012

The Religious Institute's 2009 steamy study on the topic

Big news, folks. Three American Jewish seminaries have been pronounced “sexually healthy:”

  1. Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, the Reform seminary with branches in Cincinnati, New York City and Los Angeles
  2. Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, the — you guessed it — Reconstructionist seminary in Philly
  3. Jewish Theological Seminary, the Conservative seminary in New York City

The Religious Institute (rather expansively names for an institution that says calls itself ”a multifaith organization dedicated to advocating for sexual health, education, and justice in faith communities and society”) has announced that 20 Jewish and Christian seminaries in America are doing it  right.

I shudder to think what conditions are like at seminaries that didn’t make the cut. Throngs of sexually unhealthy seminarians roaming the halls…

Conspicuously missing from the list:

  1. Yeshiva University’s Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary, the flagship seminary of centrist Modern Orthodoxy — no surprise there
  2. Yeshivat Chovevei Torah, the seminary of Open Orthodoxy – perhaps a little surprise there
  3. American Jewish University’s Ziegler School of Rabbinical Studies, JTS’s West Coast counterpart — definite surprise there
  4. Hebrew College, the pluralist seminary in Boston — big surprise there

The announcement only has details on a few of the institutions listed. About HUC, it says:

Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion in New York now includes gender identity and gender expression in its non-discrimination policy, and will display a groundbreaking collection of Jewish art that addresses gender and sexuality issues at its museum in Fall 2012, the first ever at a Jewish museum.

And about JTS:

The Jewish Theological Seminary developed two full-semester courses on sexuality issues, and now requires at least one full-semester sexuality-related course as well as clergy sexual misconduct training for all rabbinical students prior to graduation. Going forward, almost all Conservative rabbis in the U.S. will have at least one full course on sexuality issues, including education on sexual orientation and gender identity, as well as a professional sexual misconduct training—all as a direct result of this project.

No details are given on RRC.

In addition to the three Jewish seminaries listed, there are some noteworthy Jew-ish institutions on the list as well:

  1. Andover Newton Theological School in Newton Centre, Mass. also houses Hebrew College on its campus (conspicuously missing from the list, as I said before)
  2. Drew Theological School, which represents the far left wing of the United Methodist Church, is really only notable for the fact that it’s part of my alma mater, Drew University. Drew, by the way, has a Jewish president, a Jewish dean of the undergraduate college and a Jewish dean of the grad school. In fact, the only non-Jew left in one those top positions is the head of the Theo School, Jeffrey Kuan. (And as I learned while interviewing him when he was new at Drew, he’s a scholar the Jewish Bible, anyway.)

The Reading List: Occupy AIPAC, Vassar Admissions Missteps, Refocusing the Job Search, and More.

Monday, January 30th, 2012

While the Occupy Wall Street protests were generally directed at domestic reforms, the next generation has been repackaged and taken in an entirely new direction. Occupy AIPAC is one of a few anti-Israel movements that have stemmed from the original incarnation. However, whether or not this reflects a re-characterization of  what the Occupy movement stood for, or simply an extension of its principles, is debatable. [Tablet]

Across the nation, career centers at colleges and universities are retooling the ways in which they approach the job search as the sluggish economy enters its fourth year. [Forward]

After rampant  pro-Palestinian sentiment on its campus, Rutgers University officials meet with Jewish leaders, providing assurances that the campus remains committed to providing a positive and constructive atmosphere for all students. [New Jersey Jewish News]

Floridian Jews appear ready to vote Romney in tomorrow’s primary. Winning the Jewish vote may be critical for victory in the close race. However, whether the Republican nominee will be able to carry the Jewish vote in Florida for the general election remains to be seen. [Forward]

The admissions office at Vassar College mistakenly released a prototype of their Early Decision acceptance letter,  giving false hope to dozens of prospective students.  [New York Times]