Blog

Archive for the ‘Israel’ Category

Haredi Jews vs. the Internet; formerly ‘frum’ and looking for love; and more. [Required Reading]

Monday, April 30th, 2012

Clashes between the Ultra-Orthodox and modernity continue. | Photo by Flickr user jon.lai.yexian (CC BY-ND 2.0)

Off the path, on the prowl [Slate]

This might be the most fascinating article about former Orthodox Jews learning to navigate the complicated waters of love, lust, and being around… “the rest of us.” (Plus, the title is a winner; just click and see what we mean.) Meet Israel Irenstein, coach to the socially awkward, no-longer-frum.

“Having grown up in Israel and Brooklyn, Irenstein landed in secular New York with a third-grade-level education and a mediocre grasp of English. When he and his wife divorced, he found himself on foreign ground. ‘I had no idea how to talk to women,’ he says. ‘I’d never even looked one in the eye.’ Irenstein’s former Hasidic community, Gur, is one of the strictest sects, as well as one of the most sexually squeamish. Even married couples aren’t supposed to kiss, and they’re allowed sex only for purposes of procreation.

Frustrated by his own cluelessness, Irenstein turned to pick-up artists and dating coaches, including New York Dating Coach, as well as to self-help books, Tony Robbins’ confidence-building seminars, and therapy. He was less interested in learning pickup lines and routines than he was in retraining his brain; he wanted to project self-confidence. Today, that’s what he teaches—that if you feel good about yourself, you’ll have an easier time with the opposite sex. It sounds basic, but to many OTD’ers, it’s not.”

In mourning for house-pets [Forward]

Animals are a huge part of life for so many of us. But when death, the inevitable end of all life, comes to claim a beloved pet, how do we as Jews honor the important role our favorite animals have played for us, without trivializing Jewish mourning rites? Karen Iris Tucker writes:

“As a former yeshiva girl who instinctively turns to Jewish tradition for comfort in trying times, I found Enkin’s comments unsatisfying. There is, after all, a clear legacy of compassion for animals in the Torah. Deuteronomy tells us that a person is required to feed his animals before himself, and that one is obligated to relieve an animal’s suffering. The Talmud provides the precept of tza’ar ba’alei chaim — that it is prohibited to cause pain to animals. The term nefesh chaya, a living soul, was applied in Genesis to animals as well as to people.

Seeking continuity from where these laws leave off, I ultimately found that it is mostly Reform and Conservative rabbis who give more credence to the desire to mourn pets in a way that is distinctly Jewish.”

Haredim to rally against Internet dangers, according to thing I read on the Internet [JTA]

This is so going to turn into a meme. As usual, take it away, JTA!

“Tens of thousands are expected to gather for a May 20 rally at Citi Field, the Mets’ baseball stadium in Queens. The Hebrew-language Jewish Daily News reported that $1.5 million has been raised so far from donors to pay for the event.

(…)

A statement has been published in Haredi Orthodox newspapers promoting the event, and ads promoting the rally have run in American haredi newspapers.

‘It is well known that in recent times that through the Internet many serious family-related problems have been created, and it all happens because of it, and something must be done so they won’t be hurt,’ the statement said, according to The Jewish Press. ‘And since this touches almost everyone, we must assemble together to protect and be protected, and we hope that through this gathering in search of ideas we will be helped from Heaven to save the many, and may it be that we will be successful in encouraging the public not to stumble over this obstacle, and the Lord will guide us in a truthful path.’”

Pics or it didn’t happen, guys, k? LOL!

Modesty Guard, forward march! [Haaretz]
Look. This is getting ridiculous. In yet another instance of targeting women for their alleged “immodesty,” a woman in Jerusalem has received a letter asking her to leave her neighborhood for violating somebody else’s modesty standards (shocking, right?). Because apparently if you can’t persuade them, sending them ominous letters is the “logical” next step for these guys. Haaretz reports:

“R., who classified herself as belonging to the ‘Masorti’ movement, has been living with her two small children in the central Jerusalem neighborhood of Mahane Israel for seven months. She says the haredi nature of the neighborhood was unbeknownst to her when she moved there, but until today has enjoyed peaceful relations with her neighbors.

‘I came back from America and needed an apartment urgently,’ said R., ‘That’s how I got here.’ She added that she is not a malicious person, and has no desire to stir up anyone. ‘I do wear pants, but not short ones,’ she explained.

But, on Thursday, R. received a letter demanding she leave the neighborhood immediately, for having transgressed the Jewish laws of modesty:

‘[I]t will not happen here any longer. We are requesting you leave our neighborhood for having crossed the limits of the Torah of Israel and modesty in our neighborhood. We ask that you leave our neighborhood immediately. [Signed,] The Modesty Guard.’ At the end of the letter were the words, ‘This is a first and final warning.’”

Obama visits Holocaust museum [News]

Friday, April 27th, 2012

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama announced new sanctions on Iran and Syria and a renewed commitment to preventing genocide and mass atrocities.

“We need to be doing everything we can to prevent and respond to these kinds of atrocities, because national sovereignty is never a license to slaughter your people,” Obama said at the United States Memorial Holocaust Museum on April 23.

“The steps the president announced could make a big difference in the government’s capacity to prevent future genocide; the test will come in whether our leaders have the wisdom and will to use the new tools effectively,” said Mike Abramowitz, director of the genocide prevention program at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, Politico’s Mike Allen reports.

President Barack Obama also toured the museum with Nobel laureate and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel, who introduced Obama at the event. Wiesel stressed the importance of using the memory of the Holocaust to stop massacres in Syria and nuclear proliferation in Iran and defending Israel.

“The greatest tragedy in history could have been prevented had the civilized world spoken up,” Wiesel said.

Wiesel went on to say, “Israel cannot not remember. And because it remembers, it must be strong just to defend its own survival and its own destiny.”

This was Obama’s second time at the Museum. Notables in the audience included:

  • Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren
  • U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder
  • White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew
  • White House Press Secretary Jay Carney
  • Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz
  • Family members of Officer Stephen Tyrone Johns, a Holocaust Museum security guard who was shot by an anti-Semite who attacked the museum.

Obama used that opportunity to defend his record on preventing mass violence in Libya, Syria, Sudan, Uganda and Côte D’Ivoire.

“Those who stick with [Syrian President Bashar al-Assad know that they are making a losing bet,” Obama said. (The Syrian government and rebels recently formed a “cease-fire” with the help of UN envoy Kofi Anan, even though shelling continues in major cities).

Obama urged attendees to stop future genocide by preventing “seeds of hate” from “[taking] root.”

“We must tell our children about how this evil was allowed to happen, because so many people succumbed to their darkest instincts, and because so many others stood silent,” Obama said.

Obama also defended Israel and echoed what he told AIPAC Policy Conference in March: that he has fought delegitimization of Israel and the notion that Zionism is racism.

“‘Never again’ is a challenge to reject hatred in all of its forms, including anti-Semitism, which has no place in a civilized world.”
Obama concluded the event greeting and embracing members of the audience, including Holocaust survivors.

“To Elie and to the survivors who are here today, thank you for not giving up,” Obama said. “You show us the way. You show us the way. If you cannot give up, if you can believe, then we can believe.”

Zach C. Cohen is the New Voices D.C. Bureau Chief. He is the editor-in-chief of The Eagle at American University. Zach has contributed writing and reporting to TIME Magazine, the Jewish Daily Forward, AWOL, AmWord and the Suburban News. Follow him on Twitter at @Zachary_Cohen.

Hatikvah, modified; Reform cantors ordained; and more. [Required Reading]

Friday, April 27th, 2012

Making Hatikvah accessible for the rest of Israel [Forward]

Is Hatikvah a song for only a portion of its population? What about Israeli Arabs? In this fascinating piece from the Jewish Daily Forward, the question is explored, Can this anthem be modified to reflect the diversity that Israel houses?

“‘The successful integration of Israeli Arabs into Israeli life, on which the country’s future depends, has to have its symbolic expression, too,’ Philologos continued. ‘It’s unacceptable to have an anthem that can’t be sung by 20% of a population. Permitting it to stand mutely while others sing is no solution.’

So he proposed a solution, a careful adjustment of a few problematic words and phrases. In the opening stanza, ‘nefesh yehudi’ becomes ‘nefesh yisra’eli’, the soul of a Jew becoming the soul of an Israeli. And the eye that ‘looks for Zion’ (‘le-tsiyon’) can be altered to yearn ‘for our country’ (‘l’artseynu.’)

Then in the closing stanza, he suggested a skillful blend of the current language with the words of the original poem from which the national anthem was taken: ‘Od lo avda tikvateynu, / ha-tikvah ha-noshana, / lihiyot am hofshi b’eretz avoteynu, / b’ir ba david, David hana.’ That is, ‘We have still not lost our hope, / our ancient hope, / to be a free people in the land of our fathers, / in the city in which David, in which David encamped.’”

Israel and the problem of convert immigration [Forward]

While challenges to those who wish to convert to Judaism are often discussed, one area of concern is gaining prominence: immigration to Israel. It seems, despite valid conversions to the faith, many potential immigrants to Israel are facing serious obstacles. The Jewish Daily Forward writes:

“Israel’s Interior Ministry has long asserted that it has the power to withhold immigration rights from converts unless they have been residents of their Diaspora community for a period of time after they convert. It has done so in defiance of a 2005 Supreme Court ruling stating that because all Jews have equal rights to aliyah, converts may immigrate as soon as they become Jewish.

Despite the ruling, the Interior Ministry did not stop claiming power to impose residency requirements, but it applied it sparingly. Now, however, it appears to be making residency demands routinely — leaving some converts in limbo. Most of the 15 applicants refused over the past four months are currently living in Israel on tourist visas. They now face the quandary that to become citizens, they must leave their new lives and return to the Diaspora.

But even this solution is problematic. Lidiah Bikus, a convert from the Belorussian town of Kishinev, asked the Interior Ministry earlier this year what, exactly, are the residency criteria she must fulfill before making aliyah. She received a response, which the Forward has reviewed, in which the Interior Ministry admitted that there are no final or publicly available criteria.”

Reform seminary to ordain cantors for first time in history [HUC]

For the first time in history, cantors who have completed their formal study will receive a ordination, instead of an investiture. This move from the Hebrew Union College (the U.S. Reform seminary) is being undertaken for the following reasons, according to the HUC announcement:

“The term investiture is not recognized by some states as a means of conferring clergy status.  Consequently, there have been cantors barred from visiting congregants in prisons and hospitals or, in some cases, barred from performing weddings.

Cantors have had great difficulty qualifying to serve in the military chaplaincy.

Cantors now complete an intensive five-year program, comparable to rabbinical training, including a first year of study in Israel and master’s thesis, and are prepared to serve as co-clergy with rabbis.”

Jon Stewart says, “Vagina Mangers.” [JTA]

First of all, “What?” Second of all, “Uh-oh.” Take it away, JTA!

“This week it was Stewart himself who found himself under fire from the Catholic League for suggesting that women use “vagina mangers” to call attention to threats to female reproductive freedom.

Stewart has criticized Fox News for using the term ‘war on …’ from Christmas to salt, yet holding back from saying ‘war on women’ in reference to recent abortion and birth control debates. To catch Fox News’ attention, Stewart advised women to put ‘vagina mangers’ over their genitalia to catch the media’s attention. His suggestion came with a graphic that featured the manger as the Nativity scene.”

Outside the camp: Leviticus in a modern context [Huffington Post]
Rabbi Arthur Green takes a look at a section from Leviticus that has served as fodder for religious conflict, particularly over its treatment of individuals as being “inside” or “outside” the community. What can be taken away from these passages today, especially if one is modern-minded?
“Who are those we send ‘outside the camp?’ In the various Hasidic and other ultra-Orthodox communities, the standards are quite clear and severe. Anyone who breaks with the norms of traditional Jewish law, or who openly expresses doubt in divine providence or the Torah’s authority, is to be shunned. This still takes place in the old-fashioned way, including mourning as though for the dead. The Hasidim are not unlike the Amish; closed communities of the religious elect, for whose members’ excommunication can be a devastating punishment.For the rest of us, the ground is shifting. When I was younger, gays and inter-marrieds were the two kinds of Jews most likely to be kept ‘outside the camp.’ The former were seen as morally degenerate in an age that had not yet begun to deal with the origins of homosexuality and had not yet dreamed of normalizing it within the sacred bounds of marriage, as is thankfully being done today. The latter were betrayers, setting aside loyalty to thousands of years of tradition for the “mere” choice of a love-partner. This taboo, too, has been breached in most of our families, and the prospective son- or daughter-in-law is welcomed and embraced, partly in the hope that such embrace will encourage the raising of Jewish children, thus keeping the camp alive for another generation.”

Orthodox abuse exemptions; liberal zionism; spiritual misconceptions; and more. [Required Reading]

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

Are there serious misconceptions about the spiritual life? | Photo by Flickr user thekellyscope (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

Tradition, innovation, and Jewish Renewal [Zeek]

This interview with author and scholar Chava Weissler explores Weissler’s latest book on ancient Jewish women’s prayers. Weissler also talks about her study of Jewish Renewal and the creation of Havurot (and the differences between the two approaches to Judaism),  her relationship to Israel through the years, and more:

“Yes! I often use the following metaphor: the Havurah movement represents the Misnagdim and the Renewal movement the Hasidim of the Jewish counter-culture. The style of the Havurah movement is more cognitive, and the style of Renewal is more expressive and devotional. Also, the Havurah movement has a deep aversion to the ‘rebbe’ model, while the Renewal movement has seen it as a way into a heightened spirituality.”

 Orthodox abuse exemptions? [Forward]

There’s not much to say here that the Forward doesn’t say already, except, “Huh?” The Jewish Daily Forward reports:

“Rejecting a Forward request under the state’s Freedom of Information Law, the Brooklyn district attorney made the startling claim that Orthodox Jews deserve a blanket exemption from the usual public disclosure rules. Prosecutors claimed that Orthodox Jews are “unique” in that releasing the names of suspects would allow others in the community to identify their victims.

‘The circumstances here are unique,’ Assistant District Attorney Morgan Dennehy wrote in an April 16 letter to the Forward. ‘Because all of the requested defendant names relate to Hasidic men who are alleged to have committed sex crimes against Hasidic victims within a very tight-knit and insular Brooklyn community, there is a significant danger that the disclosure of the defendants’ names would lead members of that community to discern the identities of the victims.’”

Liberal Zionists and the future [Huffington Post]

In the first of a series of new articles on the ideas and actions of liberal Zionists, Leonard Fein explores what motivates this group, how “liberal Zionist” isn’t an oxymoron, and more.

“According to Israel’s pro-settler right-wing camp, there is no moral difference between post-1967 settlement in and control over the West Bank territory on the one hand, and the pre-1948 settlement of the territory that has become the sovereign State of Israel, on the other. Both are equally valid expressions of Zionist determination.

Alas, that argument cuts both ways: While right-wingers think its logic irrefutable and its conclusion — a Jewish state from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River — perfectly obvious, they fail to note that the very same logic can be used to derive precisely the opposite conclusion. As Hagit Ofran points out in her essay below, ‘by invoking Zionism in support of the settlements and the occupation, the right wing is joining the biggest opponents of Israel, who argue that if, as they believe, Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian people in the territories is illegitimate, then, by logical extension, so is the entire Zionist enterprise.’ Goodbye Tel Aviv, farewell Haifa, adieu Israel.”

Being a spiritual person: the assumptions versus the realities [Reality Sandwich]

This great piece from Jay Michaelson explores the question, “How is a spiritual person supposed to act?” Addressing the assumptions, stereotypes, and in many cases, unrealistic expectations had about the spiritual life, Michaelson also takes a look at what spirituality is truly capable of:

“These misconceptions about what a spiritual life should look like doubtless alienate many cynics and skeptics from taking spirituality seriously.  Oh, let’s leave that for the soft-minded New Age people, they say.  Whereas I see them as the spiritual equivalents of a 98-pound weakling.  Such good taste in indie pop, but so infantile spiritually.  Then again, who can blame them?  With only a few exceptions (Noah Levine of ‘Dharma Punx’ comes to mind, as does Patrick Aleph of ‘Punk Torah’), most of our spiritual heroes are either Eastern sages or Western Baby Boomers.  These are people to whom most people my age (40) and under cannot relate on a personal level.  If being a good meditator means being a 60 year old psychoanalyst who lives on West End Avenue, most of my friends aren’t interested.”

An LGBT ally; Yom Ha’atzmaut; and more. [Required Reading]

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

Yom Ha'atzmaut is the Israeli Day of Independence. | Photo by Flickr user Avital Pinnick (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Orthodox rabbi “comes out” as LGBT ally [Jewish Journal]

In this compelling piece from the Jewish Journal, Orthodox rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz expresses his feelings on the “LGBT issue,” hitting some key points about the debate on sexuality and religion. Yanklowitz writes:

“I began to wonder if I was failing at making myself accessible enough to students with this struggle. This is more than just a human dignity issue, it’s a life-and-death issue.

Other panelists explained almost as a mantra that ‘G-d is love and so all forms of love are good.’ Judaism is more legally and philosophically complicated on this issue, but it is not so complicated that we should abandon our most basic moral compass. As a rabbi, the possibility of shunning another for not obeying the specific traditional Jewish prohibition against homosexual acts is far trumped by the imperative to value and affirm the sacred dignity of every person.

One of the most crucial roles of faith leaders today is to go beyond our comfort zones and courageously expand the size of the tent of who is included, or at least not harassed, in our communities.”

 Liberal or conservative: is Judaism either? [Forward]

In this piece by Leonard Fein for the Jewish Daily Forward, the question is asked, “Can Judaism be described as inherently liberal or conservative?” Fein writes:

“Serious conservatives, of course, argue that their policies are not intended as rejections of the poor. They claim, instead, that liberalism has failed the very people it was meant to help, and that the policies they propose will offer more real benefits to those same people. They claim that theirs is not, as liberals charge it is, a politics of selfishness or a politics of exclusion. Those are claims that can be assessed, and Jews, along with other citizens, will each make their own assessment.

Most American Jews, having made their assessments, have concluded that both our interests (for example, social stability) and our values (for example, concern for social justice) point us in the same direction. So far, that direction is in an enduringly liberal one.”

Thoughts on Yom Ha’atzmaut [Haaretz]

Rabbi Aaron Leibowitz offers these thoughts on taking in celebrations of Israel’s Independence Day.

“If you are not part of the ceremonious barbeque culture it is no big deal, but when the feeling of being foreign extends to other significant days in our calendar, it certainly is. It was not until my fourth year here, when I began serving in the Israel Defense Forces, that the military protocol surrounding memorial services began to make sense to me. It was not until I experienced my first (and thank God my only) military funeral that the depth and power of the day began to open up to me. Today I view those moments as the true markers of my arrival in Israel.”

In-vitro fertilization on the rise in Israel [Jerusalem Post]

This one is pretty self-explanatory. The Jerusalem Post is reporting that the number of in-vitro fertilizations has gone up in Israel. Scroll below for the stats break-down:

“The number of in-vitro fertilization treatments to attain pregnancy in Israel has increased significantly during the past decade, the Health Ministry reported on Thursday.

About 25 percent of the treatments resulted in pregnancy, while 20% produced a live baby.

Between 2009 and 2010, 4.1% of all live births were the result of IVF, compared to 3.3% in 2005 and 2.5% in 2001.

The number of IVF cycles totaled 34,538 (women generally undergo several cycles to achieve a pregnancy) in 2010 compared to nearly 32,000 during the previous year and 18,000 in 2000. This figure represents 18.9 treatments per 1,000 women aged 15 to 49 compared to 17.8 in 2000.”

Masorti Jews to ordain gays, lesbians; Reconstructionists lose leader in Israel; and more. (Required Reading)

Friday, April 20th, 2012

Prominent Reconstructionist rabbi passes away (z”l) (Reconstructionist Rabbinical College)

The Reconstructionist movement has announced that Rabbi Jack Cohen, an influential leader within the movement, has passed away at the age of 93. Cohen (z”l) was close to Reconstructionist figurehead Mordecai Kaplan.

“He held various positions with the Foundation and with the Society for the Advancement of Judaism—including rabbi—until his aliyah to Israel in 1961. There, he became the director of the Hillel/B’nai Brith Foundation of the Hebrew University. He was a founder of Kehillat Mevakshei Derech and a passionate advocate for all things Reconstructionist in Israel. His many writings focused on the importance of education and the potential for democracy to transform Judaism.”

Updated: The original version of this article reported that Kaplan and Cohen studied together at Jewish Theological Seminary. While Cohen and Kaplan were both at JTS together (as the RRC writes, “He studied with Mordecai Kaplan at the Jewish Theological Seminary“), the report does not say Cohen and Kaplan were students at the same time. Our ambiguous phrasing has been clarified accordingly.

On Hitler and contextualizing tragedy (Forward)

In this survey of new biographies of important Nazi figures, Robert Zaretsky explores new interpretations of the life and times of the forerunners for one of history’s bloodiest genocides. In doing so, he takes a look at how historians, philosophers and more approach the “problem of Hitler” in their respective disciplines:

“And yet there are hundreds of Hitler biographies — enough to spawn meta-biographies, books like Ron Rosenbaum’s ‘Explaining Hitler,’ in which the author interviews historians, as well as theologians and philosophers, who have written on Hitler. For Rosenbaum, the endless stream of works on the Nazi leader reflects a ‘persistent anxiety that Hitler has somehow escaped explanation.’ His many interlocutors seem to agree: Historian H.R. Trevor-Roper, one of the earliest biographers of Hitler, confesses that his subject ‘remains a frightening mystery,’ while Alan Bullock, author of “Hitler: A Study in Tyranny,” concedes: ‘The more I learn about Hitler, the harder I find it to explain.’”

Israeli Masorti (Conservative) movement will ordain gays, lesbians (Haaretz)

In a historic decision, the Israel branch of Conservative Judaism has decided to allow the ordination of gays and lesbians for the rabbinate. Haaretz reports:

“The question whether or not to ordain gay and lesbian rabbis has been rattling the Conservative Movement in Israel and the U.S. for the past decade. Unlike the Reform movement that took to the question with ease, deciding firmly on the acceptance of gay rabbis. The Conservative Movement, whose rabbis see themselves bound to Jewish law, has been caught up in heated debate over the subject.”

What’s the deal with HBO’s ‘Girls’? (JTA)

Having heard a lot of buzz about HBO’s new program, “Girls,” we initially held off on posting anything until the haze of hype and critiques had cleared. But it looks like that might be a while, so we’re relenting. In this piece from JTA, Dvora Meyers explores the themes and “big ideas” of the show, which is one of the most talked about on television:

“But watch them struggle we will, and it won’t be pretty. However it’s a particular type of struggle and not one that is very easy to get behind. ‘Girls’ is not the story of underdogs, the children of immigrants or even a young adult from a middle-class background struggling in a recession that has been particularly hard on recent graduates. It follows four daughters of upper-class privilege — Hannah, Marnie, Jessa and college student Shoshana. These young women are not encountering institutional barriers to success but their own too-fortunate upbringings, which reinforced the idea that the lives and careers that awaited them were special and meaningful. They were not expecting boring nine-to-fives where no one saw them as unique snowflakes who have lived enough to write memoirs, as Hannah is doing while her parents foot the bills. (Hilariously, hers seems to be about six pages long, as befitting a 24-year-old who hasn’t been a child soldier, battled a life-threatening illness or escaped from a cult.)”

Playing politics: labeling political opponents anti-Semites

Thursday, April 19th, 2012

JTA has published a new op-ed by me, a response to an piece by some Zionist Organization of America honchos published in JTA earlier this week:

Op-Ed: Title VI should be used only on true hatemongers, not political opponents

By David A.M. Wilensky

NEW YORK (JTA) – In the eyes of the Zionist Organization of America, the most depraved enemies of the Jewish people are obnoxious college campus loudmouths. As the editor of New Voices, a national magazine by and for Jewish college students, I have a different perspective.

The ZOA led the campaign to have discrimination against Jewish students recognized as a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, originally passed in 1964 to remedy racial discrimination in programs that receive federal funding. But in its charge to circle the Jewish communal wagons, the ZOA has overreached.

ZOA President Morton Klein and Susan Tuchman, director of the group’s Center for Law and Justice, wrote in a JTA Op-Ed that Jewish college students today face “harassment and discrimination at schools receiving federal funding.” The ZOA pitched a six-year fit about it, which the group credits with this triumph: “The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, or OCR, finally clarified in October 2010 that Jewish students finally would be afforded the same protection” that other minorities have under Title VI.

The ZOA campaign capitalizes on and needlessly exacerbates the Jewish community’s already unwarranted paranoia about what’s happening to our young men and women on campus. As a member of the class of 2011 and as the editor of New Voices, I can say with confidence that there’s never been a better time to walk the halls and lawns of American academia as a Jew.

[...]

If you’re so inclined you can read the rest of it over here at JTA.

And if you’re not tickled by the fact that the ad below appears on the same page as my op-ed, you’re probably dead inside.

Patrilineal conversion; inclusive mikveh; and more. [Required Reading]

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

The mikveh is a sacred space, but not the most inclusive. | Photo by Flickr user diamond geezer (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Rabbinically intermarried [Sh'ma]

Can a couple, both intensely devoted to their particular expression of Judaism, co-exist in a household? (Probably.) The more prudent question is… What does that look like? Rabbi Julie Adler, Director of the B’rit Milah Program of Reform Judaism, shares her own experience:

“We’re each pretty certain that our way of observing Judaism is right. For us. Are we certain?  No. Our marriage works because we are open enough to the possibility that another way might be better for someone else. He might not like that I eat chicken parmesan.  I might not like that his default is to read and repeat traditional commentaries rather than inventing new interpretations to text. But we love and respect one another. We are committed to sharing one home and one life, even as we make choices that the other wouldn’t make. Most of the year, our certainty about each other is stronger and clearer than any doubts we have about our differing religious observances.

On Passover, however, it’s much harder. The rest of the year, we keep our dishes and cooking utensils kosher to his standards, but we often order in “hot dairy” from non-hechshered restaurants, and he looks aside when I bring home food he considers treyf, to be eaten with disposable utensils. But on Passover, he won’t order in, or eat out (except in kosher for Passover restaurants), and won’t allow any outside prepared food to be brought into the house. I often feel like a guest in my own kitchen. As much of the Jewish world becomes more stringent in their observances, I innately rebel and slide further and further to the left.”

Whatever you call him, just don’t call him late for shul [Forward]

Our very own David A.M. Wilensky, Editor-in-Chief and Dashing Overlord (EICDO, for short), penned this piece about his experiences as a patrilineal Jew converting to the Conservative movement. In it, he calls for the Conservative movement to reconsider its rejection of patrilineal descent.

“It’s an intolerable, unsustainable situation. I don’t begrudge Orthodoxy its understanding of Jewish law — it is what it is. Conservative Judaism is another story. If Reform Judaism weren’t the largest denomination, the argument that it has irreparably torn asunder the Jewish community in accepting patrilineals might carry some weight. In the real America, though, Reform is the largest movement and the majority of American Jews don’t belong to any Jewish denomination. In my experience, these harder to categorize Jews couldn’t care less about my mom.

The Conservative rabbinate protests that it cannot recognize patrilineal descent because that would violate its understanding of Jewish law. Coming from people who drive to services on the Sabbath, that reeks. When reality, reason and the changing worldview of the Jews in the pews have called, the Conservative movement has managed to trot out new Halacha that changes the previously unchangeable.”

Israel’s inclusive mikveh [Zeek]

The mikveh is a sacred place for Jewish spirituality. While many observant Jews are intimately familiar with the mikveh and its significance, it isn’t necessarily the most inclusive place. Rabbi Haviva Ner-David, in this article for Zeek, offers her vision of a mikveh for all.

“I had a dream of turning the Hannaton mikveh into a pluralist mikveh where anyone (man or woman, gay or straight, single or married, Orthodox or religiously liberal, Jew or non-Jew) who wants to immerse could do so, and where the terms and conditions of the immersion would be up to the one who is immersing. I also envisioned it as an educational mikveh where people would come to learn about mikveh as well as experience a mikveh immersion for the first time, and where people would come to immerse for a variety of rituals, not only the more traditional ones—for instance, life cycle rituals, transition rituals, healing rituals, etc. So I raised some money to make the place look warm and inviting and to turn it into a space appropriate for gathering and learning as well as bathing and immersing.”

U.S. Jews don’t trust Evangelical Christians [Haaretz]

Despite their often enthusiastic support for Israel, turns out Evangelical Christians have yet to win over the doubts of many U.S. Jews, according to a poll. In this article from Haaretz, Nathan Guttman explores the implications of this report:

“Only one in five Jewish Americans holds favorable views of those aligned with the Christian right, a category that includes most of Israel’s evangelical supporters.

(…)

‘I find this shocking and concerning,’ said Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein, founder and president of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, the first major group to engage evangelical Christians in support of Israel. Eckstein and other activists working on Jewish-evangelical relations expressed a sense of betrayal, accusing Jewish liberals of being prejudiced against Christian conservatives and of clinging to pre-conceived notions and stereotypes about evangelicals’ beliefs and goals.”

 

Jewish media mogul compares Palestinian people to unicorns [pause, not]

Tuesday, April 17th, 2012

Mark Zuckerberg is more pro-Palestinian than Newt Gingrich

Apparently Facebook is more accepting of Palestinian peoplehood than, oh, I don’t know, Newt Gingrich.

Obviously, this joke was too good to be missed, so I posted this very screenshot to Facebook earlier today.  David (the Editor here) aptly pointed out that Facebook isn’t actually claiming that the Palestinians are a people, just that there do in fact exist Palestinian people.  His analogy:

Like, you could post about unicorns and Facebook might agree that you were talking about them without making any sort of claim about their actual existence.

To which I replied:

Careful, I see an Electronic Intifada headline right there: “Jewish Media Mogul Compares Palestinian People to Unicorns.”

This, of course, was just begging to be turned into a blog post.  So here we are!

Women, the Kotel, and me. [Gender]

Monday, April 16th, 2012

The strongest people in my life have always been women. I didn’t plan for that. It just happened. Growing up in a restrictive, uber-religious environment, I am familiar with every scripture (both Jewish and Christian) used throughout history to justify the inferior treatment of women. And yet, like something out of a fairy tale or myth, the women in my life have always managed to transcend whatever circumstances life has thrown at them. They are resilient. I respect their ability to survive, to cultivate lives of beauty and truth despite any system, religious or political, that would discriminate against them on the basis of biology.

It’s why Women of the Wall, despite my never having met them, hold a special place in my moral imagination. When I envision Israel as I want it to be, equality of genders is at the forefront. Public religious plurality is paramount. The work of these women, who affirm my esteem of the courage and intelligence of the gender, is a bold step in that direction. Through a torrent of hateful jibes and violent language,  absorbed and heard with no retaliation, the Women of the Wall continue in what seems to be an uphill climb for Israel: balancing the voices of all its citizens and taking in the prayers and solidarity of Jews around the world.

And what of the critics? Surely those who see Women of the Wall as a threat to their vision of Judaism have a voice too? Absolutely. My freedom to affirm what Women of the Wall does is only so strong as my willingness to hear out the critics, both balanced and vitriolic. The reality stands: if this is such a controversial issue, one unique in its ability to bring together women from all of Judaism’s major streams as much as the hatred and venom of the ultra-Orthodox, its resolution could signal a turning point for how Israel relates to both pluralism and gender equality. Perhaps that’s why its opponents often lash out with such disregard for human integrity in their words (just read the comments section here). Either way, what the Women of the Wall do is defining Israel. And make no mistake, if they’re making a mark on Israel (the country and the people), so too are their opponents, for better or worse.

The Women of the Wall continue to make headlines because they refuse to give up. Labeled heretics, bad Jews and worse, these women are persistent to a point I can only dream of. Among schoolboys, the phrase persists, “Grow a pair.” This sexist language denotes a person becoming more courageous or bolder, as if male anatomy equates to a stronger self-constitution. For examples of how misguided phrases like this actually are, I take a look at the women of my life. Beyond them, I take a look at the Women of the Wall, and I aspire to their courage.