Blog

Archive for the ‘Letter to the editor’ Category

Yes. You’re right. We are ‘Wall Street Jews.’

Thursday, April 12th, 2012

Yep. That's us.

We received an odd letter here in the New Voices office last week: A single piece of paper with a collection of magazine covers featuring some classic money-Jews (Madoff, Greenspan, etc.) and the words “WALL STREET JEWS” in large letters followed by “…OCCUPY WALL STREET” in smaller letters.

I guess it’s kind of true, in that New Voices headquarters is a few blocks from Wall Street.

This week, Gawker received some some of these as well:

A bunch of us here at Gawker Media have received letters recently containing nothing but this single photocopied montage of magazine covers bearing the words, “WALL ST. JEWS.”

What is the deal with this mysterious mailing, anyhow? Why the persistence required to design, copy, and laboriously mail so many letters to so many people? What is the messagehere, about all of these Jews, on Wall Street? Put your guesses in the comments.

[Confidential to all lone nuts out there: just keep mailing your bizarre letters and you'll make Gawker eventually!]

Ours is way more special though, because theirs doesn’t appear to have the part about Occupy Wall Street.

Anyway, it was addressed to Zach C. Cohen (a writer who is not actually based here in the office). It claimed to be sent from “M. Hoenlein” (we assume this is meant to be Malcolm Hoenlein, the head of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations). But the actual return address turned out to be the address of Park Avenue Synagogue.

So that was weird.

MSA meetings not quite so welcoming? [Letter to the Editor]

Monday, February 27th, 2012

Our post on the NYPD’s spying on Muslim students elicited a letter to the editor from Marion D.S. Dreyfus:

I have attended MSA meetings. They are not ecumenical, they are not inclusive, they are not unharmful. They surrounded me when they saw i was taking notes. Imams came in and began spouting shariah-filled  homilies that put the lie to the  supposed  way they run their  ship–they were all about conversions and trickery; they held the (largely ill-educated student body) assembled with the promise of hot, free food at the end; they denied all the stuff we know to be true–taqqiyyah in action. (Audience members questioned stoning the raped woman as if she were an adulterer; people wondered about forced genital cutting for children; amputation for minor crimes was denied–all of the public face of these ‘students’ in the muslim outreach infiltrate community were suspect, unfriendly, hostile to the knowledgeable, and frankly scary.) No equivalent exists for Christian groups or students, and Jewish groups parallel simply don’t exist–Hillel parties have no congruency whatsoever to these unattractive conspiratorial attempts to co-opt the unaware, unknowing, gullible and poor.

marion ds dreyfus

There are a few things in here that I want to respond to briefly.  While I obviously can’t speak to the particular MSA meetings that Ms. Dreyfus has attended, the description she offers is pretty far from anything I’ve ever experienced.  The reason David put up the original post is a) it’s news about students, which is what we’re here for, and b) as members of a religious minority that’s been subject to a great deal of discrimination and hatred in the past, we’re particularly sensitive to the notion that practitioners of a particular religion are inherently less trustworthy or more dangerous than others.

Lastly, the commonly-held belief that Muslims are responsible for a hugely disproportionate share of terror attacks is absolutely false.  Who says?  The FBI.  Here’s a nice summary of their data from Loonwatch.com:

According to this data, there were more Jewish acts of terrorism within the United States than Islamic (7% vs 6%).  These radical Jews committed acts of terrorism in the name of their religion.  These were not terrorists who happened to be Jews; rather, they were extremist Jews who committed acts of terrorism based on their religious passions, just like Al-Qaeda and company.

Only an anti-Semite would look at the FBI’s data and conclude that all Jews are dangerous terrorists whose religion compels them to destroy the Gentiles.

We’re always interested in hearing from readers.  Talk to us at editor@newvoices.org.

Update: this post was revised to reflect a lightly edited version of the submitted letter and a slight correction to the author’s name.

How to not get your comment deleted OR What did Judy Joo ever do to deserve being called a cockroach? [The continuation of the Holocaust denial saga]

Tuesday, December 6th, 2011

Judy Joo is not a cockroach!

Last week, we published an article about acclaimed (by the sort of people who acclaim such things) Holocaust denier Arthur R. Butz, a professor of electrical engineering at Northwestern University.

Yesterday, I put together a blog post featuring some of the emails I received in response to that article, all of them from members of Butz’s fan club.

There are also a number of comments on the original article and yesterday’s post. At New Voices, comments by someone who has never commented before must be approved, usually by me. In response to one comment that asked why a previous comment had been deleted, I thought I’d share a couple of rules to help you make sure your comment get approved:

  1. No death threats. I don’t care how tongue-in-cheek it is. I don’t care how clever it is, or how thinly veiled it is. If your comment includes a clever way to kill the subject of the article or blog post you’re commenting on, it’s not gonna get approved.
  2. Use a real email address. If you make a death threat in the last line of your otherwise acceptable comment (I’m looking at you, Guy-Using-A-Clever-Mob-Like-Name-While-Cracking-Wise-About-Offing-Someone), I’ll try to email you and ask if you don’t mind me removing that bit of it before I post it. But it the email address you gave me doesn’t work, I can’t email you. And if you leave a follow-up comment asking why your comment didn’t appear, providing the same email address, I still can’t address your problem.
  3. Be funny. One comment was so outrageously inflammatory that it almost didn’t get approved. But its author was just linguistically innovative enough that I approved it. In it, he goes on and on about all the terrible things the “Jooz” have done. And his comment left me with this question: What did Judy Joo (of “Iron Chef UK” and “Next Iron Chef”) ever do to deserve being called a cockroach?

 

‘Defamation of a genius’ and other defenses of our favorite Holocaust denier [Letters]

Monday, December 5th, 2011

Butz's book among his less controversial electrical engineering course materials | by Gabi P. Remz

I was surprised by the volume of emails I received in response to last week’s article by Gabi P. Remz about Arthur R. Butz. Butz is a professor of electrical engineering at Northwestern University in Chicago. Tenured decades ago, he’s now more well known for his work as a Holocaust denier than his academic areas of expertise, which, according to our article, include “digital signal processing” and “median and related filtering.”

These missives, all of them from Butz’s fellow members of the Holocaust denial community, are simply too good not to share. So I’ll share them.

This first one, from Mr. Zan Overall,  is my favorite. It came with its own preamble, which reads, in part:

Dear Mr. Wilensky,

I would like to submit an article for New Voices but I don’t imagine I qualify since I am not Jewish, immature
and a student at some college or university.

Well, immaturity isn’t exactly a requirement around here, but I won’t count that against him. More of the preamble to the letter itself:

…let me introduce myself.  The simplest way to get to know me is to go to youtube.com

and search for “Introducing the Wise Old Man.”  You will find all six of the videos I posted there under
that soi-disant moniker.  One called “The Wise Old Man at the Stephen S. Wise Temple” is
action-packed.  I hope you might get some laughs out of my sketch “God Is a Goy? Oy!”

I will snail mail some Holocaust revisionist literature. No, no, don’t thank me!

Indeed, I think I won’t. Anyway, his letter:

I read “He Still Teaches, Students Still Squirm,” your attack piece on Professor Arthur Butz of Northwestern University.

He is the author of the book The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, which disputes the conventional story of the “Holocaust.”

Two things jumped out at me when I read the article.

#1: “Many campus groups tried to engage Butz in public debate or discussion, which (Rabbi) Balinsky opposed. (Belinsky is a former Hillel director at Northwestern.)

“ ‘To give him a platform is to give him everything he wants,’ said Balinsky. ‘We thought it would be a terrible mistake.’ “

That is the only opinion I found to agree with in the piece.

Yes, Rabbi, it would have been a catastrophic mistake to debate Arthur Butz! Jews insult and try to injure people who speak out against their lies. They have learned not to debate them! Jewish Holocaust “authorities” like Raul Hilberg were shown up and embarrassed at the Zundel trial in Canada, when the issue was joined openly in a court of law.

#2: “(Northwestern student) Toizer, talking about what comes to mind when he thinks of Butz, said, ‘How can someone so educated be so ignorant about something?’ “

I would stake my life on the proposition that Arthur Butz knows a great deal more about the so-called “Holocaust” than young Toizer. To call a man of Dr. Butz’s stature and accomplishments “ignorant” makes you open to the same charge, Master Toizer.

I have a suggestion for Mr. Toizer, Mr. Remz, David Wilensky and everyone at New Voices.  Read  The Hoax of the 20th Century and compose apologies to Dr, Butz.

– Zan Overall, the Wise Old Man at youtube.com.

This one was forwarded to me by Zan “The Wise Old Man of youtube.com” Overall, the author of the previous letter. (The forwarded email included this proclamation from Overall: “My credentials? The Anti-Defamation League called me a ‘Holocaust Denier.’ I must have done something right.”) The forwarded message was actually a brief blog post titled “Defamation of a genius” by a Robert Faurisson:

I am in the habit of calling Arthur Robert Butz “Doctor Genius”. For me, he is the Number One scientific revisionist of ”the Holocaust”.

I have just read the article about him in the American online publication New Voices (“National Jewish Student Magazine”), dated November 30, 2011 and entitled “He still teaches, students still squirm”. Nothing in the piece suggests that the author, one Gabi P. Remz, a first-year student at Northwestern University where Butz is Professor of electrical engineering, has really read The Hoax of the Twentieth Century or any other of Butz’s studies that have since accompanied that masterful work of his. In 35 years (1976-2011) not a single historian, academic or researcher has been able to make a rebuttal to it or refute it.

Before condemning Butz for the results of his research one should at least take the trouble to read him!

Next, the letter with the most exclamation points:

Why do you people persist on smearing the likes of Dr Arthur Butz and millions of others who stand for the truth?

What is your problem here anyway?

Get a life for God’s sake and grow up!!!!

–Eric Yankovich

I’ve chosen to end with this one because of it’s rather uplifting message. According to this email, we can all rest assured that last week’s article did nothing to shake Butz’s confidence. On the contrary, our article was simply further proof of the professor’s excellence:

It is true that Art Butz’s research has yet to be rebutted, but our friends in the Holocaust Industry have been slandering him for 35 years and I doubt if he is overly concerned about new attacks in a Zionist student magazine.

Our Zionist friends are not exactly famous on account of their regard for empirical evidence, are they?

If anything, this latest attack is another feather in Art’s much-decorated cap.

It is more evidence that he is still actuel, as our French cousins say.

–James Damon