Blog

Archive for the ‘Other Voices’ Category

New Voices blogger Gabe Schivone’s new HuffPo column [All grown up]

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

Our own Gabe Schivone, who wrote the interview series Other Voices last semester, has moved on to his very own Huffington Post column.  His first piece is up:

Any free society–from Margaret Thatcher’s Apartheid-era Britain to Obama’s currently anti-immigrant America–cannot expect to adequately deal with the sort of violence that prompted the Tucson shootings while refusing to address, much less acknowledge, the greater violence connected to government policy plaguing our neighbors in the AZ-Sonora deserts and cities, and communities nationwide, year after year.

We’ll miss Gabe’s ongoing enthusiasm for all aspects of Palestinian solidarity work, and wish him the best in his new endeavor!

Noam Chomsky: Palestine/Israel Among Biggest Issues on US Campuses [Other Voices]

Monday, December 5th, 2011

Here’s Noam Chomsky on the enormously changed landscape on US campuses over the past twenty years surrounding the US/Israel-Palestine conflict. Among the issues discussed is the growing influence of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) groups and the petty isolation of pro-Israel groups on campuses.

The following is a raw excerpt from dialogues with prominent social critic and linguist, Noam Chomsky. The conversations were held in his office at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, on 21 October 2011. Other excerpts from that interview were previously published by New Voices here.

Schivone headshot - Color x100Gabriel Schivone: Last weekend in New York City—the day before I saw you speak at Barnard College, in fact—Students for Justice in Palestine convened the first major national conference of its kind.

Noam Chomsky: Yeah. How’d it go?

It was amazing; the sheer level of college activism demonstrated by the registrants and participating groups alone was deeply inspiring. The wide degree of awareness and activity seemed to be beyond what anyone could have known or hardly imagined.

It’s one of the biggest issues on campus. You could see that at Barnard the other day when I spoke. If you go back a little before that, there would have been police protection from harassment and so on.

Between the fall 2010 and spring 2011 semesters alone, there were two mass mobilizations for national statements by SJP groups throughout the US that garnered between 50 and 60 group signatories. So, for conference attendance, I personally thought maybe there would be 70 participating groups, which I thought would be quite a stretch. But more than 100 chapters present and still many more that couldn’t attend directly? That’s the level of anti-apartheid college activism in the 1980s.

Chomsky in Oslo, September 2011 | photo by Flickr user synnetonidas (CC BY-NC-SA)

I’m not surprised. You could see it right there at Barnard. Hundreds of people turned away because the gym couldn’t hold them all. I don’t know if they told you, but the Hillel organization wanted to run a counter-conference, I think, the day before, but only a couple dozen people showed up.

The usual pathetic numbers, yeah.

And you could tell that in the Barnard audience, during the Q&A. There was a small group of kids off in one corner. And if you noticed, they were all reading prepared questions. These questions are prepared for them. It’s sort of like a catechism. And it happens all the time now. They read the question, a little group cheers—

And the whole place cheers at your answer, like what happened time and time again at that talk, I noticed, after each of them read their questions.

Yeah, they’re very isolated. But they used to dominate and just control everything. It wasn’t that long ago when they used to break up meetings. Even right here at MIT. Did you know Israel Shahak?

Uh-huh, yeah.

You knew him?

Well, I didn’t know him personally.

But you know who he was.

Yeah (laughs).

He came to MIT about 20 years ago and was staying with me. Among other things, he gave a talk here. Now, picture this guy: he’s a holocaust survivor; he was in the Warsaw Ghetto, Bergen-Belsen concentration camp. And he was one of the leading human rights activists in Israel, where he was very much respected. During his talk, the audience was flooded with right-wing, Zionist kids who were very carefully organized. And they essentially broke up the meeting. And he’s pretty tough, so he didn’t answer them back the way they were talking to him. But I remember at one point, some kid who looked sixteen years old, wearing a skullcap, got up with an audience and said, “How could you say those kinds of things about Israel when six million of us died in the Holocaust?” This little kid was talking to a guy who came out of the Warsaw Ghetto and Bergen-Belsen! I had a couple of friends there who were refugees from Europe, including my neighbor next door. They said they hadn’t seen anything like that since the Hitler Youth. And that was just twenty years ago. And, in fact, when I’d talk even at MIT, the police would insist on walking me back to my car, just because of the threats they were getting. But now, as you say, they’re just a tiny, isolated group. That’s an enormous change.

Gabriel Matthew Schivone is a Chicano-Jewish American from Tucson, AZ, and an organizer on the ad hoc steering committee of Students for Justice in Palestine National Conference 2011. He was a passenger aboard the Gaza Freedom Flotilla 2. E-mail: gschivone@asu.edu. Twitter: @GSchivone.  His column, Other Voices, appears here on alternating Mondays.

Occupying the occupiers [Other Voices]

Tuesday, November 8th, 2011

Members of Jewish Voice for Peace’s youth wing, Young, Jewish and Proud, disrupted an event last night in New York City hosted by Birthright Israel-Next.

According to their press release:

Using the ‘human microphone’ or ‘people’s microphone’ made famous by the Occupy Wall Street protests they interrupted a Birthright Israel Next-sponsored event. The event featured CEO Steven Pease, and was called “The Golden Age of Jewish Achievement,” part of Birthright Israel’s Next’s ‘Wall St.’ series. Pease was addressing the question of ‘Why Jews are disproportionately high achievers?’

Young Jewish and Proud organizer Carolyn Klaasen

The young Jews used the human microphone, one person saying a short phrase and others repeating back, to read a site-specific version of their declaration which calls for young Jews to take similar actions wherever the ‘1%’ of their own community gathers. The disruption will be broadcast on Occupy Wall Street’s video stream. Afterwards, protesters stayed outside to continue reading their declaration and share stories of their experiences of what they saw as Birthright’s dishonest presentations of Israel. Their numbers more than doubled as passers by joined them. Later that night, via twitter, Birthright Israel offered to “dialogue” with the protesters. Birthright Israel was previously the target of a Young, Jewish, and Proud spoof email offering a fictional ‘Birthright for All’ trip that included Palestinians.”

I interviewed two of the organizers/participants, Liza Behrendt and Carolyn Klaasen on their group’s goals, reasoning and vision with the “occupy” event and general outlook on organizing within the American Jewish community around the US/Israel-Palestine conflict.

Liza Behrendt graduated in May from Brandeis University, where she organized with Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace.  She continues to work with JVP as a board member and a Young, Jewish, and Proud leader. She now lives in Brooklyn as a member of Avodah: The Jewish Service Corps, working as a community organizer at Gay Men’s Health Crisis.

Carolyn Klaasen is currently earning her M.A. at Union Theological Seminary, where she is involved in organizing Protest Chaplains for Occupy Wall Street. Before attending Union Carolyn lived and worked for the Community of Living Traditions, a Jewish, Muslim and Christian residential community dedicated to activism and nonviolence. She has been a JVP member for almost a year, and is a Young, Jewish and Proud leader.

SCHIVONE: What is this “occupy the occupier” protest all about?  What do you aim to achieve?

Liza Behrendt: We aim to empower Jews to take back their community institutions, just as people in diverse communities nationwide are doing with Occupy protests.  Institutions like Birthright claim to represent all young Jews in offering them a free trip home, rendering invisible the many Jews who oppose Israeli policies, including the Law of Return that allows Jews, but not Palestinians, to move to Israel.

Carolyn Klaasen: After spending the majority of my activist life resisting occupation in Palestine, I have developed a new relationship with the word “occupy” in these past two months down on Wall Street. From the very beginning of OWS I have seen it as inextricably linked to my Palestine solidarity activism, and “occupy the occupiers” is about making that connection clear.

It’s not okay for banks in the U.S. to profit from foreclosures and the financial crisis, and it’s not okay for anybody to profit from the ongoing occupation of Palestine. We’re calling for Jews to show solidarity with Palestinians and with OWS by standing up to the 1% in our own community.

In terms of race and class, which kinds of Jews or institutions (or both) are you referring to as part of the US-based 1%?  Is the action individual-based or institution-based–or both?

LB: We are calling on people to target institutions. The reality is that many Jewish institutions are dangerously dependent on a small handful of donors or foundations, who subsequently have a disproportionate influence on the political and social agendas.  Unwavering support for Israel is the most glaring issue, but last night’s Birthright event, glorifying capitalist gain during a time of dreadful inequality, is another example.

The target was a Jewish nationalism event by Birthright Israel-Next, New York, which, according to its description, asserts that the “Jewish contribution to science, literature, the arts, and industry far surpass their miniscule numbers (less than .1% of world population).” Suggesting to prove their statement, they invite “Author, venture capitalist and turn-around CEO Steven Pease, raised a Presbyterian, [who] asks why Jews are disproportionately high achievers and attempts to answer these questions through hundreds of fascinating case studies, ultimately making the case for the important role Jewish culture has played in this high-achieving result.”

Your response? Would you explain why you thought this was an appropriate target for the action?

LB: The narrative of a modern-day chosen people is detrimental to our community.  It encourages chauvinism and keeps us out of touch with the urgent global problems facing all people, including Jews.

CK: Steven Pease’s book celebrates a capitalist model of success that is part of the problem we’re protesting down at Occupy Wall Street. One of the figures he lifts up is Lev Leviev, whose role in the blood diamond industry and settlement investments is incredibly problematic.

Birthright is among our list of powerful institutions that maintain Israel’s corporate-backed military control of the Palestinian people, in this case by targeting Jewish youth. In addition to Birthright being a highly problematic institution, this was an event explicitly linked with Wall Street that praises Jewish achievement in a messed-up system–all of which made it a perfect target.

The closing paragraphs of the “Occupy the Occupiers: A Jewish Call to Action” urge young Jews and allies to “occupy Jewish institutions that actively obstruct human rights for Palestinians, like AIPAC, the Jewish Federations, Birthright, the Jewish National Fund, Hillel, and the foundations of right-wing philanthropists, like the Schusterman Foundation, which impose ideological litmus tests on Jews who want to work in or with the Jewish community… [as well as] the offices and stores of the multinational corporations that profit off of human rights abuses in Palestine.”

It seems the aim is to disturb these spaces and make them unsafe for the status quo. Is this accurate?

Yes, that is accurate, although the word “unsafe” makes me uncomfortable, given a legitimate sensitivity to anti-Jewish oppression. Occupy Wall Street has begun shifting national discourse by interrupting the status quo, and its continued success depends upon the broadening of tactics and targets.  The demands for accountability and power redistribution are applicable in communities everywhere, and Jews must join the fight.

Gabriel Matthew Schivone is a Chicano-Jewish American, founder of Jewish Voice for Peace at the University of Arizona and co-founder of UA Students for Justice in Palestine. He is also a volunteer with migrant justice organization No More Deaths/No Más Muertes. He currently attends Arizona State University and can be followed on Twitter via @GSchivone. His column, Other Voices, usually appears here on alternating Mondays.

California to Palestine: Fasting in Solidarity | Other Voices

Monday, October 10th, 2011

Schivone headshot - Color x100Ilana Rossoff is a daycare worker by day and political organizer by night. She recently graduated from Hampshire College, where she studied US History, race studies, and Jewish studies, and completed a senior thesis on the history of Jewish anti-Zionism (mostly) in the US. At Hampshire, was active in Students for Justice in Palestine, Student for the Freedom to Unionize, and White Anti-Racism Folks, at one time or another. She has also been active as a student organizer in the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network for over two years. She currently lives in Morristown, NJ, where she is slowly thinking about how to shake things up, and is always looking for accomplices.

SCHIVONE: Talk about Friday night’s protest at the Wall Street Occupation.  Why did IJAN want to organize this gathering, and why on the most solemn and important of Jewish holidays?

ROSSOFF: I helped to organize a contingent of people to be at Occupy Wall Street in New York City as part of a national and global campaign to bring together issues of profit-driven mass incarceration, political repression, and prisoners’ rights in the US and Palestine – geographically-separated but intertwined struggles. This past week, the International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (IJAN) had put out a call for actions to be held in three cities, to demonstrate (in some form) in solidarity with the prisoners on hunger strike in Palestine and in California. A couple weeks ago the Campaign to Free Ahmad Sa’adat (a longtime leader in Palestinian political resistance) put out a call for widespread global demonstrations. This was to highlight the indefinite hunger strike initiated on September 27 by many Palestinian political prisoners, specifically demanding an end to prisoner isolation and humiliation during location transfers. At the same time, on Sept. 26, the prisoners at Pelican Bay State Prison in California announced they were resuming their hunger strike, which they started and ended this past July after negotiations began with the prison administrationover their demands for better conditions for themselves and visitors. We wanted to bring attention to both hunger strikes, and recognized the importance of connecting the issues of political and racist incarceration of Palestinians and racist, politically-motivated mass incarceration, disproportionately of people of color, in the US. Yom Kippur was very timely, in this sense. Yom Kippur is said to be the most important Jewish holiday, as Jews take seriously the wrongs we have committed against other people, ourselves, and the world at large, and ask for forgiveness. In doing so, we promise that we will actively seek out those whom we have wronged and do things to make it right with them.

Photo courtesy of Ilana Rossoff

Photo courtesy of Ilana Rossoff

At this moment in history, American Jewish communities bear an particular collective responsibility for atonement and action. Whether or not it is acknowledged explicitly, the silence of the overwhelming majority of Jewish communities about the expanding Israeli occupation and general racism towards Palestinians in Israel and the diaspora is always with us. Injustices against Palestinians are carried out in the name of Jews globally, whether or not we agree, and unless we confront them directly, these injustices are allowed to speak for us.  Thus, there is a dual injustice and a dual responsibility – both to prevent it from continuing and to actively oppose its speaking for us. On this year’s Yom Kippur, it felt timely and meaningful to extend the usual 24-hour fast into a 48-hour solidarity fast. Not only did that give it greater  significance to me personally, but it transformed the tradition of fasting into something both collective and immediate, very powerful qualities for spiritual practice and political work.

How was it physically for you to fast?  Was it a struggle, so to speak?

Physically, it was only hard on the last leg of the second day. The first day was easy because I was energized for the action in New York City, and then totally distracted by it. Also, fasting for one day is not so hard for me because I normally fast for one day on Yom Kippur every year. But sitting in temple all day on Saturday became pretty brutal, not having fasted for that long before just sitting mostly in one place singing beautiful songs while debating their meaning to me from about 12:00pm to 6:30pm … what I’m getting at is that it wasn’t pleasant. But I got through it, as I knew I would. Thinking about the hunger strikes and the global solidarity campaign really inspired me and gave me the motivation to stick it through to the end.

There was a political purpose behind the fast, and it affected you physically.  In that sense, the fast was at once personal and political. Is that accurate?

Yes. I think that phrase has a different meaning, though; that the systems of control and domination that we understand to operate on a large scale in society affect our everyday living and ways of being (a concept mostly introduced to the feminist movement by radical feminists of color in the 70s and 80s). But on the same token, our bodies do not exist in a different world than these politics, and being in solidarity with a hunger strike 5,500 (and 3,000) miles away literally means not eating (or drinking much) for two whole days. It takes a degree of privileged separation not to understand fully how the political structures of our world physically impact us day to day. You already know that if you, say, can’t visit your family member across a border 20 miles away, or rely on international agency-provided food and shelter. So yes, it was affected me personally, but in different ways than it would others.

This fast was definitely more meaningful for me because there was an applied context and it meant something beyond just myself. As I said earlier though, it was not just about how it made me feel in my personal, spiritual practice, but had genuine significance as a part of an international effort of solidarity with political prisoners. While I physically felt the lack of food and hydration of the fast, I was always aware that it was not really about relating to the experiences of those in prisons, because it was not possible to. Those on hunger strikes from within prisons are choosing to stop eating or drinking for an undetermined period of time, in a facility where they already have little control of what happens to their bodies, with the hopes that the administrators or politicians will care enough to notice and negotiate with them, unless public outrage forces them to first. It is a precarious last resort, utilizing one of the only things they still have control over – all the more reason to raise hell on our end to make it known that they are putting themselves on the line for better and more just conditions for themselves and others.

Talk a bit more about IJAN. Describe yourselves as an organization of individuals – what are your goals and principles, in a nutshell?

IJAN is a really powerful group of people and I’m really excited to be a part of it as it continues to shape its role and work within the Palestine solidarity movement. I came into IJAN the summer after my first year at Hampshire College, which was the first year I started doing Palestine solidarity work, after encountering some IJAN organizers at the White Privilege Conference in Memphis at the “Zionism = Racism” workshop they put on. In all of my confusion about the seeming conflicts between what I had been taught was part of my Jewish identity and being opposed to the Israeli occupation, working through all of the emotional attachments to Israeli exceptionalism engrained in my me by so many Jewish institutions, IJAN brought a really clear analysis of the role that Zionism plays in the displacement and exclusion of Palestinians, the racism inherent to the idea of a Jewish-dominant or exclusivist state, and in the interests of American Zionist or “pro-Israel” organizations. Today, IJAN is strong in Chicago, the Bay Area, the Twin Cities, England, France, Spain; and present in Atlanta, Los Angeles, New York, Geneva, Argentina, Morocco and a few other places. While the bulk of its work is concentrated in the US at the moment, IJAN’s scope is international because it understands Zionism to be the root international force which drives, supports, and justifies the ongoing ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.  The organization is very principled, and positions its opposition to Zionism within a broader framework of opposing colonialism, imperialism, and racism, as well as gender and sexual oppression, in all forms – understanding the role that Zionism plays in services of Western imperialism and racism, how Western imperialism reinforces Zionism, and at the same time how Zionism relies on its own forms of imperialism and racism. IJAN also asserts its own, independent stake against Zionism as an organization of Jewish people.  Because Zionism claims and monopolizes all of Jewish history and culture in order to garner support for the colonization of Palestinian land and culture, it erases the multiplicities of Jewish history and culture, particularly anti-Zionist and anti-capitalist histories. Thus, IJAN asserts, Jews have a stake in the movement to decolonize Palestine, as our histories and futures are entangled in it. What really resonates with me about being a member of IJAN is that it places me in the movement with a clear position to oppose that which is done in my name, but not because there is something inherently valuable about a Jewish voice on the issue of Zionism. In fact, we reject that idea, which privileges Jewish voices and ideas over those of Palestinians; rather, we believe that because of our position of political privilege as Jews, which gives us more legitimacy on the issue, we must be vocal to oppose the injustices committed in our name and directly confront that which speaks for us.

I know that while a lot of people of my generation are coming to disassociate themselves from Israel and even Zionism, not everyone is doing it in such an explicit or confrontational manner. I wouldn’t suggest that everyone should come and join IJAN immediately (unless you’re really moved to!), but I would encourage anyone second guessing the myths of Zionism that they were raised with to go further than that: investigate the realities of Palestinian life and history under occupation, and begin to think about how you can make a meaningful contribution to their struggle for justice and freedom. The longer we remain silent, the longer others speak for us in the name of injustice.

Gabriel Matthew Schivone is a Chicano-Jewish American, founder of Jewish Voice for Peace at the University of Arizona and co-founder of UA Students for Justice in Palestine. He is also a volunteer with migrant justice organization No More Deaths/No Más Muertes. He currently attends Arizona State University and can be followed on Twitter via @GSchivone. His column, Other Voices, appears here on alternating Mondays.

Recently Convicted, 1 of the Irvine 10 | Other Voices

Monday, September 26th, 2011

Schivone headshot - Color x100Taher Herzallah is one of the newly convicted students collectively known as the “Irvine 11”. Ten of the original eleven were prosecuted (one had his charges dropped) by the Orange County District Attorney’s Office and, this past Friday, convicted of “disruption” and “conspiracy to disrupt” a public lecture by Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren at the University of California, Irvine, in February 2010. Herzallah is a senior majoring Political Science and International Affairs at the University of California, Riverside. He is a member of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and the national campus coordinator of American Muslims for Palestine (AMP).

SCHIVONE: Students for Justice in Palestine today released a national statement of solidarity that leads with a quote by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. following his March 1956 conviction for violating the state of Alabama’s antiboycott law: “Ordinarily, a person leaving a courtroom with a conviction behind him would wear a somber face. But I left with a smile. I knew I was a convicted criminal, but I was of my crime. It was the crime of joining my people in a nonviolent protest against injustice.” Walking out of the courtroom following your own conviction on Friday, how did you feel and how do you feel now?

HERZALLAH: That quote really characterized how the 10 of us felt that afternoon.  I feel no shame in what I did.  On the contrary, I feel I was performing my civic duty by speaking truth to power and would be willing to do it again in a heartbeat if given the opportunity.

GS: Many activists have expressed shock and anger at the measures the State of California took against all of you – because many activists routinely carry out similar actions as the Irvine 11 but face no consequences. One of the most widely covered examples was organized by a group of American Jewish and Israeli Youth called “Young, Jewish and Proud” who stridently interrupted Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech at the Jewish Federation of North America’s general assembly in New Orleans this past November. The Associated Press reported that “[s]heriff’s deputies escorted [the protestors] out to a chorus of shouts and boos, and they were released without charges.”  You, on the other hand, faced multiple charges, a long trial process and now a conviction and state punishment. What do you believe distinguishes the Irvine 11 case from this and other examples?

TH: First of all, I do want to thank those Jewish youth for standing up against Netanyahu.  Their courage and bravery gave us strength and I commend them for their actions.  Second, we do realize that our protest occurred in Orange County which is known to be a bastion for conservative, right wing residents as well as Zionists.  I also do believe that the fact that we were all Muslim students who protested made the District Attorney feel that we were an easy target to prosecute since the public would take his side in Orange County.  What the DA didn’t know was who he was really messing with.  It wasn’t just us he was prosecuting, he was going against an entire movement, much larger than just 10 Muslim students and he lost the media battle and will eventually lose the legal one.

GS: You’ve said you know the pain of Israel’s occupation firsthand. Would you elaborate?

Taher Herzallah (left).  Photo courtesy of Taher Herzallah.

Taher Herzallah (left). Photo courtesy of Taher Herzallah.

TH: I can never truly say I have felt the pain of Israel’s occupation because I’ve never lived there.  But what I can say is that my family has suffered severely in the Gaza Strip and several of [my] relatives were killed in the Israeli assault on Gaza in 2009.  To say that I understand the brutal reality of occupation would be more sufficient.

GS: Is this what wholly or in part moves you to do this sort of anti-occupation advocacy work in the US?  Why do you believe such work is important?

TH: Definitely.  My motivation comes from my own experiences and understanding of what the situation is like on the ground.  I think that is important because the causes of motivation don’t allow me to sit back and relax while things are happening around me.  I am determined to fight for this noble cause of ending Israeli occupation and for the disenfranchised Palestinian people.

GS: You and I did an interview this past May the day that students and youth interrupted a University of Arizona (UA) lecture by Tucson Unified School District (TUSD) Board President Mark Stegeman in order to expose and educate on the Board’s intent to vote on Stegeman’s proposal to comply with the AZ State Legislature’s ban on Ethnic Studies.  TUSD is currently appealing the ban’s implementation at the state level, thanks to the actions of the students. This is what you had to say in solidarity that day (May 3):

“What the state and [TUSD] administration is imposing is an injustice to the intellectual hunger and cultural needs of students. And I urge all students who are passionate about and dedicated to their education…to continue to engage in civil disobedience until their demands are met. …Erasing history from books is more dangerous than not taking kids to school.  And the students maintaining their Ethnic Studies programs at all costs can stop this disease before it spreads to other states.  My best of luck and solidarity to you all, and I hope we hear some good news tonight.”

I never got the opportunity to ask you: Why do you feel these sorts of inter-movement solidarity are needed or necessary?  Some activists within each movement say there are enough problems to deal with and that the individual movements should engage their own issues and problems first and foremost before “helping” any other movement.  What do you think?

TH: I think inter-movement work is absolutely necessary to our work as Palestine activists.  It’s important to realize that many other movements seek to challenge the status quo because of its oppressive nature.  Human struggle to protect human dignity is not just confined to one movement or cause, it runs through a plethora of other issues that we should all be engaged in.  Yes, it is difficult to mobilize on just one front but it’s important to be ready and willing to work with other like-minded individuals to maximize and manifest true change.

Gabriel Matthew Schivone is a Chicano-Jewish American, founder of Jewish Voice for Peace at the University of Arizona and co-founder of UA Students for Justice in Palestine. He is also a volunteer with migrant justice organization No More Deaths/No Más Muertes. He currently attends Arizona State University and can be followed on Twitter via @GSchivone. His column, Other Voices, appears here on alternating Mondays.

A socialist ‘JewMaican’ for Palestine | Other Voices

Monday, September 12th, 2011

Schivone headshot - Color x100

Full Name: Haley Jennifer Joy Pessin

Bio: Haley Pessin is a junior at Williams College in MA majoring in French and History. She thoroughly enjoys reading books, attending the theatre and classical music concerts, and consuming gelato.

You identify as a “JewMaican.” Would you explain what led you to identify this way?

Well, my father kinda made up the term. Since I was younger, he told me I had the best of both worlds. I was always told I was biracial, and I was always taught about both sides of my family–historically, culturally. So for me, even though, as an atheist, I don’t practice any religion, and I don’t look as a typical Jew, I couldn’t see identifying any other way. It would be to deny my heritage.

(photo courtesy of Hailey Pessin)

(photo courtesy of Haley Pessin)

You told me you don’t ever identify as a Black Jew. Why is biracial a more accurate way to see yourself and represent yourself outwardly?

Basically, it’s for the same reason I call myself Jewish and Jamaican. Calling myself just Black or just Jewish or a Black Jew would be to deny one over the other. A lot of people just assume that I’m Black, or they don’t have any idea who or what I am.

Both sides of my heritage have a history of slavery and resistance, which is something I’m proud of. And both sides have given me cultural experiences that i think make me who I am. Like, we have a joke in my family that if you know a Jew for 10 minutes, you’ll know their whole story, but if you knew a Jamaican for 10 years you’ll know absolutely nothing about them.

It’s also political, why I identify that way. It’s more recently a political thing for me.

How so?

Because when people place a label on me without knowing me, it’s not just from a misconception, it’s a reflection of social norms. And so my very existence in a way is sort of subversive. My parents are a multiracial couple, and that’s still not expected or acceptable in society. For example, when we go to a restaurant the waiters and other customers don’t assume we’re a family because they can’t conceive people like us living together.

Talk about how your siblings identify. Do they all call themselves JewMaican?

My siblings all identify differently, which goes to show how much the norm fails to account for diversity, and how idenitiy is malleable to your experiences. My siblings didn’t grow up in the same household. In their household, their mother was Black. One, my sister, more identifies as Black, and one, my brother, more identifies as white. My sister even joined a Black sorority. But we all identify as Jewish, even though our overall identities are different.

Unlike them, I grew up in a family with both Jewish and Carribean cultural influences. Our Jewish side is where we all came together. We all celebrate Chanukah and Passover. We all identify as ancestrally and culturally Jewish.

Are they involved in activism of any sort or are you the giraffe of the family?

Yes, and no. We’re all involved in different types of activism, I’d say, which in a weird way reflects our identities a little bit. My sister, who identifies as black, has a lot more faith in the system and sort of in a way, represents in her mind Black people who made it, who are actually are pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps. She works in the juvenile justice system.

I’m probably the only one that is very pro-Palestine and is radical. They’re not so much radical at all. So the giraffe would be me.

Speaking of giraffes, when did you begin to get active in Palestine solidarity and what inspired you to do so?

I became involved in Palestine solidarity about a year ago. First, I was already in an organization that was doing Palestine solidarity work, the ISO [International Socialist Organization]. But I’d never personally been involved. It was something I’d always understood, not in a who’s-right-who’s-wrong sort of way, but in an anti-imperialist context. I didn’t know as much about the situation primarily in the occupation or in Israel. I didn’t know about the apartheid system, I didn’t know about Israel’s racist laws. All I knew was that Israel advances U.S. foreign policies, and I was against that.

The reason I got involved originally was because of a group on my campus, Students for Palestinian Awareness. They had been prevented from speaking openly on the issue of the occupation. They had their signs torn down when they tried to have meetings. There was even an altercation when they tried to pass out fact-sheets during the annual Israeli Independence Day event. Several of them received racist emails and Facebook messages. I knew it was something that our administration didn’t want talked about. It was so censored, the group could barely do anything on campus. So it became an issue of who would their advocates be when there were so few students who knew about the issue, and so few administrators or students willing to support them.

And then I had the opportunity to hear [Palestinian civil rights leader] Omar Barghouti speak and I bought his book, “BDS” ["Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions: The Global Struggle for Palestinian Rights"].

At the time, I was also in a class on the Middle East in which people were really polarized on the issue, so I felt the need to learn more about it. I didn’t have all the facts one way or the other.

Once I actually learned what was going on and realized how much was being concealed or made into a taboo subject–especially at my school–I was so shoked and disgusted by the aparthdeid system and how many people were dying as a result of the occupation, as well as the fact that it was all talked about as an Israeli defensive strategy, rather than reality of Israel as an aggressor.

What really convinced me most was understanding the dynamic of the oppressor and the oppressed. Because if you have a situation in which the odds of who holds power are stacked against the oppressed, you automatically have a situation of violence and instability. You can’t say that the violence and resistance of the oppressed is the same as that of the oppressor because the reason that those conditions exist is of a fundamentally unjust state. All this pushed me to learn more about it.

It even came to the point where my own father, who was pro-Israel at the time, came to see cracks in the justification for the Israeli state being in the interest of Jews. For him, it was after the flotilla attacks and when he and I began talking more about the situation.

You talked about organizing on campus and the difficulties faced there. There’s been talk among Students for Justice in Palestine circles across the country about the first national conference coming up next month [at Columbia University in New York City]. What do you see as the potential for organizing outside campus with other Palestine solidarity activist groups?

It’s much easier when that happens because, rather than working in isolation, you’re working within a national movement with greater resources and more experienced activists. The benefit of the conference will be sharing experiences with other organizers and creating connections with a national movement.

You sound excited.

Very. This is one of the most exciting things that’s happened in a long time. I think it’s going to be a major milestone for campus organizing in the U.S. and what comes out of this conference in terms of organizing and solidarity in the U.S. can be very significant.

When I was talking with your dad he told me he used to be a pro-Israel Zionist. Do you think your involvement in Palestine solidarity had something to do with your dad coming around  into what might be called post-Zionism?

Definitely. Because we used to get into heated debates about the issue. He considers himself very left, so I was surprised to hear him talking about the situation almost exclusively from a Zionist perspecteve. The argument was that the Jews never had anywhere to go. And if there was ever a Palestinian state, then there would be more violence against the Jews. He didn’t get that the none of this should justify the oppression of Palestinians.

But also, him coming around was not just because of me, but because of Israel’s own actions. Israel was making it impossible for him to believe what he had been saying before, that it was in the interest of Jews to support the state.

In July my father and I went to a Bar Mitzvah and we were both very surprised to hear one of the songs they were singing, which described peace in Israel. Because, if the interest of Jews is really peace, then everyone has to be opposed to what the State of Israel is doing. What Israel is doing is a barrier to what everyone wants, which is peace.

You are a socialist. Would you talk about your view of a future society and in what ways Palestine solidarity is relevant to that?

Well, any part of the world where oppression exists, it also exists on a class basis. It’s easier for the U.S. and Israeli governments and the small minority of profiteers they represent to perpetuate foreign policies that increase their profits when there is a scapegoat to point to as inferior or violent or less democratic.

These justifications make it easier to conceal the ways in which they exploit their own citizens. This is a thing that is most evident today in the context of an economic crisis where the lack of jobs and cuts to vital public resources ought to be a bigger concern than fighting wars that offer virtually no benefit to the vast majority of US and Israeli citizens.

In fact, it would be impossible for our governments to continue such exploitative policies without such a high degree of oppression and divide-and-conquer strategies to sever links between people who might otherwise mutually oppose them. This is why such seemingly benign actions as peaceful protest and the smallest degree of resistance are called out as terrorism in the mainstream media and repressed with such brutal and often violent force, particularly at a time when public opinion is shifting against Israel’s denial of rights to Palestinians.

So, as a socialist, I feel it is imperative to be in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle for liberation because we can’t expect to win a society that provides for everyone’s basic needs, rather than the exorbitant profits of a few, if we don’t start by challenging the racism and oppression that are barriers to winning a more equitable and just society and on which capitalism ultimately relies.

Gabriel Matthew Schivone is a Chicano-Jewish American, founder of Jewish Voice for Peace at the University of Arizona and co-founder of UA Students for Justice in Palestine. He is also a volunteer with migrant justice organization No More Deaths/No Más Muertes. He currently attends Arizona State University and can be followed on Twitter via @GSchivone. His column, Other Voices, appears here on alternating Mondays.