Blog

Posts Tagged ‘palestinians’

Chasids do the Dougie; wigless photo controversy; and more. [Required Reading]

Friday, February 17th, 2012

Video mashes up Chasidic celebration with “Teach Me How to Dougie” [Youtube]

A hilarious YouTube video featuring a clip from what appears to be a Chasidic wedding dance paired up with Cali Swag District’s meme-tastic song has hit the web. Hey, they’re better than the Black Eyed Peas. Curlier too.

Wigless photo of former chief rabbi’s wife sparks debate on Orthodox modesty [Forward]

Prepare yourselves; this one is a doozy. An old photo of Rav Ovadia Yosef’s family is making the rounds on the web. Rav Yosef, the former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel, is both a beloved and controversial figure in the Jewish world. Yosef has been known for his hell-raising threats about women who wear “modesty wigs” instead of full-on head coverings. But the photo, which includes Yosef’s wife (Missus former Sephardic Chief Rabbi?), is particularly steamy because it features– wait for it– her hair and collarbone. Not a wig, scarf, censor bar, or bag-with-eye-holes in sight. We’ve seen a lot here at New Voices, but there’s nothing that throws us into a hormonal rage more than a little collarbone-hair action (although ankles are a close second). If your hearts are strong enough, check the link above for all the “saucy” details.

Reform world mourns death of beloved scholar [Forward]

W. Gunter Plaut, author of the celebrated “Torah: A Modern Commentary” recently passed away at the age of 99. Plaut, whose commentary on the Torah is one of the most widely-circulated texts in Judaism, is being remembered as a man of principle, as rooted in tradition as much as modernity, and one of the best-loved teachers in the history of Reform Judaism. Eric Yoffie, until very recently the president for the Union for Reform Judaism, had this to say:

“Plaut was a man of great courage in many realms. In the Reform movement, his was a generally traditional orientation. Proudly Reform and liberal in a classical sense, he nonetheless advocated for those elements of tradition that he saw as central, even when it was unpopular to do so. He spoke out against rabbinic officiation at interfaith marriages when many in the Reform movement were adopting a more flexible view; he called for more emphasis on Saturday morning worship at a time when Friday evening, Erev Shabbat, worship was central in Reform synagogues, and he urged greater Sabbath observance at time when the subject was hardly discussed.”

Women who chant Torah are being progressive and traditional at the same time [Tablet]

As more and more women are participating in the act of making aliyah (going up) to read from the Torah, it becomes apparent that a fascinating marriage of ancient and modern ways is being joined. Blazing new trails by taking the old paths, what do women have to offer to their communities by this ritual undertaking? Siân Gibby shares her own journey, both to Judaism, and to this act:

“But as Leora Tannenbaum, an Orthodox woman writing for Tikkun, has argued, there’s no reason to believe that women would take this any less seriously than men—and indeed much to suggest the opposite. ‘When I am learning and practicing my leyning, I feel as though the Torah is inside my head, heart, and body. It is an organic part of me,’ she wrote. ‘Why would anyone want to deny this experience to girls and women?’”

Death of Palestinian children sparks racist reactions [+972]

After a crash between a bus and a truck near one of the Jerusalem-West Bank borders, taking the lives of nine children and an adult, web comments took the time to “thank god” that the lives were “merely” Palestinian. +972 Magazine shares just a few of the comments cropping up online, then offers some thoughts on why this sort of racism continues.

“I decided to bring these comments to the fore for one reason. Israelis tend to accuse Palestinians of being immoral because once and again the Israeli media shows Palestinians gloating and celebrating over the death of innocent Israelis. The reaction of these ordinary Israelis to the death of Palestinian children shows that the ‘moral’ party in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not so moral after all.”

 

 

 

Day school decline; Madonna plays Israel; and more. [Required Reading]

Monday, February 6th, 2012

Madonna scheduled to begin world tour in Israel. | Photo by Flickr username Crazy-Heart (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

What is beautiful to the Jews? [Tablet]

How should Jews respond to the work of great Western classical composers, when so much of their work is rooted in a Christian understanding of the world? Is there an “appropriate” response, or does it really even matter? David Goldman explores the relationship between a Christian conceptualization of beauty and aesthetics, and that of the Jewish people.

“This past July, I dined in a kosher restaurant in Vienna with a young priest from an Austrian Stift who is finishing his studies in philosophy in Rome. As we finished the wine, Father A. challenged me: ‘What is your definition of beauty? My opinion of you will depend a great deal on your answer.’ That is an important issue for Catholics, who believe that an earthly institution, namely the Church, holds the keys that unlock what is locked in heaven. If that is possible, God must make himself knowable in some way to humans, for example, by taking human form. One of these ways is beauty.”

Unidentified chemicals used at car checkpoints on Palestinians [+972]

What sorts of devices are being in Palestinian cars during predetermined Israeli checkpoints, and what security purpose do they serve? Haaretz explored this question in a recent article, but +972 has added a few more details to the story with a personal account of the device (and the inspection).

“The checkpoint examination usually goes like this: There are about six lines of cars going out through the checkpoint. At each line, there are one or two ‘security’ officers that ask for IDs, and decide whether the car and its riders do or do not constitute a major threat to Israel’s ‘security’ and ‘existence.’ If they do not, the officer gives the car a white ticket, which means they are done with the ‘security’ check. If they do, then the car gets a green ticket. Once you get the green one, you have to go to the far right line for a special check. You are asked to open all doors, take out all your belongings and go through a physical check while the car is separately searched.”

Pointy bras and kabbalah: Madonna to launch world tour in Israel [Jerusalem Post]

It looks like Israeli fans of Madonna will get the first look at her new worldwide stage show, which launches at Ramat Gan Stadium in late May.

Jewish day schools take bold financial steps to make programs affordable [Forward]

With threats to the survival of the day school program for many Jewish communities, some leaders are trying secure the continued use of the programs and make them as open as possible: all this in light of discouraging downward trends for Jewish day schools in general.

“According to recent Forward analysis of reports by the Avi Chai foundation, non-Haredi day schools are in a state of stagnation or decline. The Schechter Network of Conservative Judaism has lost 20 schools and 35% of its enrollment since the late 90s. Unaffiliated schools, commonly known as community schools, are barely holding steady. For day school proponents, the shrinking numbers and shuttered institutions represent a blow to the idea behind Jewish education, the notion that Jewish day schools are a key to Jewish continuity.”

Piss on the Queen of England [Global Jewish Voice]

Monday, January 23rd, 2012

Israeli native Liran Shamriz grew up with rabid, Israel-obsessed articles an international media mainstay. Here, he turns the tables.

French people are whores and Americans are all fat and stupid.

If that makes you angry, then I’ve succeeded. If not, just tell me who you are and I will find the words to make you feel the way I feel when I read a foreign news article about Israel.

[...]

News reporters are supposed to search for the truth. But it doesn’t happen anymore. All I can feel is their search for fame through cheap headlines.

Two examples, in two top newspapers in the world, of outrageous headlines: “Israel is a Pirate State,” from the French newspaper Liberation referring to the Gaza Flotilla

[...]

Sometimes, the articles don’t do justice to the headlines. In the English Guardian newspaper, we see “Mutilated children of a Crippled Palestine.” The article doesn’t read as inflammatory, (as inflammatory). The bashing isn’t just the result of a few outspoken journalists – this is editorial discretion.

[...]

Keep reading at the Global Jewish Voice.

The Palestinians Could Recognize a Jewish State – They Don’t Think They’ll Have To

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011

MIDEAST ISRAEL PALESTINIANSBoth Israel and the Palestinians have a precondition for negotiations to continue. The Palestinians want construction in the settlements to stop and the Israelis want the Palestinian Authority to recognize Israel as a “Jewish” state.

The fact that these are the two things that the two governments have to declare publicly demonstrates neither side wants to restart peace talks.

On the Palestinian side, Mahmoud Abbas wants to maximize Palestinian leverage over Israel. Both Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas have rejected genuinely serious offers from Ehud Barak in 2000, then Ehud Olmert in 2008. Israel now faces the diplomatic wrath of the world with only the United States and a smattering of other countries behind her.

Israel has both Netanyahu guarding his political coalition and its psychological insecurity about the physical security of the country adjacent to a territory over which it would not have military control.

As for whether or not Netanyahu’s or Abbas’ government constitutes a “partner for peace,” that depends on whether or not the two sides actually want to negotiate. At that point, either both sides are so-called “partners” or neither is. History would say either side would eventually cave to negotiate, but the Palestinians have never had this much leverage before and they seem set on using it.

What are Israel’s Priorities?

Thursday, April 21st, 2011


Netanyahu Looking Like a Wreck

This has dragged out too long. Just shut down the settlement expansion.

I have to admit, I am a Religious Zionist. Not all RZs support settlements, but most do . . . and but I do. The settlements actualize the imperative to settle the country. If the land is bought from a private owner, there is nothing stopping me from celebrating it.

I am also a realist. They give Israel some more breathing room territorially and reach at the negotiating table . . . that is until now.

Diplomatically, the comfort zone the country has had building them was probably going to decay – eventually. I think that point has come. The extra cards it gave Israel in negotiations do not mean anything if the world does not let you negotiate. This is not judging the settlements as legal or illegal under international law; nor moral or not; nor conducted while respecting private property or not. There is simply too little breathing room these days. Shut down the enterprise. Shut it down.

The prospects of international isolation are very real. While Jews worldwide and Israelis especially think the situation with the Palestinians as much more complicated than issues of independence and self-determination, the rest of the world simply does not agree.

The world simply prioritizes Palestinian independence over Israeli security. There is little Israel or the global Jewish community can do about it. We will, by majority, disagree with the planet on this. Public relations and negotiating tactics are out of step with global opinion. The country simply has been caught off guard by the drive toward Palestinian independence. With that, Israel ought to go with the flow and change its approach to the Palestinians. Allow the West Bank and Gaza Strip their independence, merely with the stipulation that border and refugee issues have not been finalized, and that goes doubly for Jerusalem. Just outright support it – just ask for some time to design a withdrawal plan.

I expect Netanyahu to say something like this soon. But as of now, he does not have the political foresight to out-pace this situation. The UN will recognize Palestine as an independent state. Even if the Syrian protests turn into a civil war and the world allows Israel more leeway in how it positions the IDF (i.e. in the West Bank), the pressure is just going to come back.

Building the settlements was the right idea. It expanded Israel’s physical territory. No one knew how far it would eventually go before it became too much of a problem. Given the situation, I am guessing this would be a time to consolidate what Israel has gained and re-focus on other issues. Israel has no vision for its future.

Everyone has been running too scared to choose the country’s path. What preparations have been made for Palestine actually becoming an independent state? What does that mean for the priorities of the Jewish State in such an event?

As for the country’s identity, what would be Israeli policy toward a Palestinian state; goals of Zionism; security and religious interests under Palestinian rule; and settling the Galilee & Negev?

The lack of priorities has left Israel unprepared for the “diplomatic tsunami” that seems to be headed toward its pristine Mediterranean beaches.

Will Israel try to get a million new Jewish immigrants? Will it expand its economic power? Its cultural influence? Settle disputes between Jewish denominations in Israel and reform civil law? Write a constitution? There are simply no goals. There is no clarity.

AND as for Religious Zionists: the West Bank and Gaza are still holy land – it’s not going anywhere – it will just be under Palestinian government. It cannot constitute a priority compared to Jerusalem on the one hand or domestic stability on the other. But when was the last time you heard a settlement leader talking about the Temple Mount instead of a less significant hilltop somewhere south of Hebron? Religious Zionist leadership is out of step with reality and has no vision for its community and its religious goals. Of all the priorities that are contorted, twisted and far from straight, theirs seem to be the utmost.

The Double Reading List: Jewish Student A Cappella Groups Unite!

Monday, April 4th, 2011

This reading list also counts for Friday.

Can’t get enough Jewish a cappella? You’re in luck! Kol HaOlam, the first Jewish student a cappella competition, took place this past weekend, and some videos are here. [Gather the Jews]

Speaking of Jewish a cappella, here’s the Pesach offering from the Fountainheads. Rebuttal, Maccabeats?

And speaking of videos, here’s a cool one from (surprisingly) Aish retelling the Exodus story through social networks. The only part of this that sucks is the stupid, irrelevant and anachronistic part about world leaders blaming Israel. Come on.

One more video: remember the Angry Birds spoof of Israeli-Palestinian discourse? Here’s a similarly clever spoof of protests in the Arab world. Thanks to Marc Tracy for showing this to us.

The good news: Rutgers is paying Toni Morrison $30,000 to speak at commencement. The bad news: Rutgers is paying Snooki $32,000 to speak at the school. Time for students to pull a Wash. U. [NJ]

Should students intern without pay? [NYT]

A cause for optimism: young, nonviolent Palestinians. [Time]

Ben Murane attended both TribeFest and the J Street conference. Here’s what he has to say. [Jewschool]

Gary Rosenblatt tells Jewish organizations to stop using alcohol to engage students and young people. [JW]

European Jewish students love to conference. [JTA]

“Israel is a place where real people live”

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

An amazing blog post by Dr. Sarina Chen at the Jerusalem Post encapsulates the central problem with how many people–and many college students–talk about Israel. Some, particularly those who have been on Birthright, see Israel as a spiritual wonderland where everything is perfect and the state is infallible. Others, conversely, view Israel solely through the lens of the conflict with the Palestinians and don’t realize or understand that it’s a country with strong points, struggles and flaws. As Chen writes about her students at Northeastern University:

I found out that these two opposite attitudes actually have something in common- both of them refuse to see Israel as a place of real living people: Individuals with loves and hates, with families and jobs, with dreams and disappointments. They ignore the fact that Israel deals with many internal social and economic problems, the fact that Israel is a multi-cultural country. …

It seems that both of the mentioned groups do not really understand that Israel is not only a political issue, or an exotic Jewish paradise. It is not a chess table where you can easily define the “black” and the “white.” Israel is a place where real people live their life in a highly complex situation.

Very, very well said, Dr. Chen. Here’s to bringing more nuance and complexity into the conversation about Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The Reading List: Sorry, Jewish Boys…

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

Portman engaged, expecting first child Natalie Portman is engaged and pregnant. [People]

American Football hits Israel, a step up from the storied Jerusalem yeshiva boys’ flag football league. [NYT]

All the young Jews get together on Christmas Eve. [JIDaily]

Seven YU high school students will get to take a class with a renowned Israeli author. [YNet]

Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, will address 200 Jewish students this week in Jerusalem. [JPost]

An Open Thank-You Note to President Clinton

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

Dear Mr. President,

I want to thank you for your column in the New York Times today, on the anniversary of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin’s assassination. Your exhortation to “take up the cause for which Yitzhak Rabin gave his life” is as pressing now as it was in 1995, and your grounded determination for peace should inspire everyone who cares about seeing a peaceful future for Israelis and Palestinians.

You described Rabin as a “hard-headed idealist,” a combination of qualities to which I aspire. I know, though, that many peace-minded supporters of Israel, like me, have a hard time figuring out how to manifest our idealism in the harsh reality of today’s conflict and the discourse that surrounds it. It seems, often, that we must choose between idealism and realism, that we can only hope for our dreams to come true if we ignore what’s actually going on.

It wasn’t always this way. I’ve written before about how–when I was younger, when you were president and particularly when Rabin still lived–I had a realistic hope of peace, security and harmony. Maybe I was too young. Maybe I was naive. I don’t think, however, that I was alone.

I want to know how to recover that feeling of realistic optimism. In your column, you write that “We can all do something, in our communities or around the world,” to further this vision of peace. And now I ask you: what, beyond writing a blog post or sending some money, can we do? How can we have the most substantial impact on this situation, so that we can help build the world we want to see?

I want to dedicate my life to this work, but sometimes I feel as if nothing I do will make a real difference. You became president and began a historic peace process, something most of us would not be able to achieve. So what can we do?

The Perils of a Book Boycott

Monday, September 6th, 2010

As a law student, my required reading is painfully boring and rarely controversial.  So I have to say I envy the Brooklyn College students who are being forced to read a book by someone Bruce Kesler calls a “radical pro-Palestinian professor,’” who at least will have something interesting to discuss. Forget disinheriting the college; I’d happily trade the students this book for my regulations homework. Kesler, though, decided to disinherit the school–his alma mater–from his will for assigning it.

In full disclosure, I haven’t been able to read the book so I am forced to trust Jonathan Helfand of Brooklyn College’s Department of Judaic Studies, who said in an interview with the Jewish Week, “The final chapter takes up the Palestinian cause and blames their problems on the Americans and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”  I am hoping to order a copy of the book (once students forced to read it and sell it back so I can get it cheap) and decide for myself.

Even if the reports are true and the book is virulently anti-Israel, I have to disagree with Bruce Kesler’s choice to punish the college for selecting it as required reading.  What’s next, punishing a school for assigning “Das Kapital” in a history course? I have been assigned books and readings I have disagreed with and so far it’s  been only to my benefit. Knowing why people may disagree with me forces me to sharpen my beliefs and be prepared to defend them with fresh rigor.

I want to be sympathetic to the argument that students are being indoctrinated to hate Israel, but does the pro-Israel community really want to start a boycott? We’re the people of the book. We read and write controversial literature; we don’t ban it. This position speaks of fear, and as a StandWithUs Emerson Fellow, I believe Israel can stand up factually to its critics without resorting to censorship. What does Bruce Kesler think Israel has to hide?

I also don’t want this to turn into a censorship fest. If this precident holds, I am afraid that professors will be afraid to put out any information about the Middle East for fear of economic repercussions. It is hateful and wrong to deny students an education based on what donors think they should be learning. I would hate for Saudi Arabia to protest pro-Israel professors and threaten to withdraw funding if any books are assigned. We all saw what happened in the Michael Oren debacle last year, and it’s only getting worse. Just watch the news to see educated people incapable of having a conversation,instead shouting over each other’s voices, trying to sound right instead of listening.

I cannot support the choice to disinherit the college based on a single reading assignment, even if it’s a required one.  Had I the power,  I would have humbly suggested that Mr. Kesler ask the students to read a second book, such as Leon Uris’s “Exodus” or “New Essays on Zionism,” edited by David Harzony. I know forcing college students to read more could be considered cruel, but to paraphrase my wonderful legal writing professor, it would be a great task for the students to compare and contrast the information.

Dare I suggest we all learn to listen to each other with respect? We might actually learn something.